• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

new future toy.. the Intel NUC

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Intel's "cutting edge research" consists largely of trying to catch up with the technologies used in ARM processors such as that found in the Raspberry Pi.
    Except of course that it also results in cutting edge semiconductor fabrication, multicore programming tools, high speed intoconnects such as pci express, and various other useful innovations.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      Oh well. That's part of your life you're never going to get back, eh?
      it was a feck sight better than staying at home with the parents.
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Sysman View Post
        it was a feck sight better than staying at home with the parents.
        If you remember the 60s, you weren't there.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          Except of course that it also results in cutting edge semiconductor fabrication, multicore programming tools, high speed intoconnects such as pci express, and various other useful innovations.
          You'd think that with all that going for them they'd be able to make a processor that wasn't tulip, wouldn't you?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
            If you remember the 60s, you weren't there.
            Too young for that bit.

            The sixties were gone by the time I was 16.
            Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Sysman View Post
              Too young for that bit.

              The sixties were gone by the time I was 16.
              Me too, in fact, you're older than I am.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                You'd think that with all that going for them they'd be able to make a processor that wasn't tulip, wouldn't you?
                You mean that half the computers in the top500 and the apple macs beloved of fanbois everywhere are using tulip processors?
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  You mean that half the computers in the top500 and the apple macs beloved of fanbois everywhere are using tulip processors?
                  Yep. Intel have spent 30 years polishing a turd. All in the name of backwards compatibility.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
                    Yep. Intel have spent 30 years polishing a turd. All in the name of backwards compatibility.
                    And the end result is the best choice for an awful lot of applications. Doesn't say much for the rest of them does it?
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by doodab View Post
                      And the end result is the best choice for an awful lot of applications. Doesn't say much for the rest of them does it?
                      I'm not sure that I understand your question.

                      Would it surprise you to learn that more ARM processors have been sold than 80x86 compatibles?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X