• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

CUK confirmed as a quality news source

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    I don't know what you mean about the spelling

    Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.
    Watching Newsnight last night, that was the conclusion of the chattering classes.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by swamp View Post
      Oi! I read the Daily Mail!



      PS: Well done CUK!
      The Prosecution rests, m'lud!

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
        Nick Fitz is going to be mortified.
        I'm just astonished to see the Mail linking back to one of its sources rather than just nicking the content as usual

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by administrator View Post
          We have made it people, CUK linked to from the DM:

          But no mention of how much Fiona Bruce's house is worth so ultimately I am disappointed
          Soon there will be a picture of your house with its worth!

          Well done

          Comment


            #25
            IR35 does NOT state that working for one company alone isn't allowed. This is how the vast majority of contractors work.
            - d000hg, Durham, 03/5/2012 16:02
            Why does that name ring a bell?
            Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
            I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

            I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
              Why does that name ring a bell?
              One of your sockies?

              Comment

              Working...
              X