Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Female Infanticide
Collapse
X
-
-
That would be a very bizarre law. A whole industry in back-street sonography would appear overnight.Originally posted by k2p2 View PostYou could stop telling mothers the gender of their unborn child.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Certainly was common practice in my area when I had my kids. They wouldn't tell you the gender for that reason. Dunno if it's still the same.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThat would be a very bizarre law. A whole industry in back-street sonography would appear overnight.
Legislating isn't really the answer. Changing attitudes to female children is. But that ain't going to happen.Comment
-
Historically it was the done catholic thing to have large families.Originally posted by ChimpMaster View PostWhat, the Irish?
These days people are getting married later and families are smaller.
As for gender specific abortions, certain hospitals in the UK will not tell parents the sex of their child especially if they are located in area where there is a certain cultural bias in the poulation.Comment
-
I suppose I'd rather have back-street sonography than back-street abortions.Originally posted by zeitghostGosh.
A Plan B emerges.
I'm not sure it's the "done thing" for Catholics to have large families, rather than simply that Roman Catholics don't approve of birth control and nature takes its course.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Good point, well presented. <pc mode on>Except you can't tell the gender by ultrasound, because they might be transexual or anywhere on the gender spectrum, and that doesn't show up.<pc mode off>Originally posted by k2p2 View PostYou could stop telling mothers the gender of their unborn child.
Strange attitude though. I'd've though most men would prefer a surplus of women. Maybe that particular sector of society are all gay? Is that it?Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Gender spectrum
Like only having 66% of a willy... is that what happened to <insert CUK username>?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Yes.Originally posted by yetanotherbob View PostDiffer with the opinion that it's scandalous to abort a foetus based on its sex?
If the couple having the baby want a boy then it should be down to them. My white non catholic friends now have 4 boys because the wife wanted a girl... How nice for the kids to know that they were not good enough for mum. Cheerful subject.Comment
-
With an attitude like that, she's not fit to be a parent in the first place. Having kids for your own gratification has to be one of the most selfish things you can do.Originally posted by bobspud View PostYes.
If the couple having the baby want a boy then it should be down to them. My white non catholic friends now have 4 boys because the wife wanted a girl... How nice for the kids to know that they were not good enough for mum. Cheerful subject.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I disagree. I see nothing wrong here. Although why abort a female? If anything, abort a male if they want to save suffering.Originally posted by pacharan View PostSurprised we haven't covered the Telegraph's recent expose yet.
This is scandalous.
Goodness knows. I find it odd people have a problem with abortion.Originally posted by pacharan View PostHave to ask the question though, why is this more morally repugnant than the case of a woman who doesn't want the child just because, say, it's going to get in the way of her career?
Every woman that goes through with an abortion deserves a hug, cake and a thumbs up from everyone.
That would take a while since females outweigh males making up 52% of the worlds population.Originally posted by pacharan View PostOne is legal and the other isn't. I can see a practical reason for the former being illegal as the male- female ratio in our population could become skewed, but the moral one?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What is a tax-efficient salary for 2026/27 as a limited company director? Today 06:23
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Mar 6 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Mar 5 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03

Comment