- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Oh dear, that's blown it...
Collapse
X
-
-
-
How dangerous is kissing?
As an aside, at the dentist's today (first time I've been to this surgery) I had to squirt my hands with their soap bottle at reception. wtf.Comment
-
Doesn't explain things very well does it?
If most of the victims are men,and most men are straight, then that suggests that the culprit is muff-munching.
So how come there are not a load of lesbians with it too?
Odd....Comment
-
I think I could find a way to stop her talking tulip like this.Originally posted by zeitghostIndeed.
Most perplexing in its oddness.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
There are probably more men than lesbians who do it. Not necessarily a higher proportion, but a higher number.Originally posted by KimberleyChris View PostDoesn't explain things very well does it?
If most of the victims are men,and most men are straight, then that suggests that the culprit is muff-munching.
So how come there are not a load of lesbians with it too?
Odd....Job motivation: how the powerful steal from the stupid.Comment
-
True...I hadn't thought of that.Originally posted by Ignis Fatuus View PostThere are probably more men than lesbians who do it. Not necessarily a higher proportion, but a higher number.Comment
-
So according to your interpretation, if a bloke gets sucked a couple of times a day by the lady of his choice, he's likely to get throat cancer and die somewhere in his 50s or 60s. How many men would say that that's a price worth paying?Originally posted by zeitghostWhen I first read of this before I watched the horrid programme on C4 (or whereever), I'd got the incorrect impression that ladies doing the Linda Lovelace would be more prone (as it were) to this.
However, far more men are sore afflicted.
Odd.
And most perplexing.
So furballs weren't the only side effect.
Ho hum.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
What, on the mouth?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHow dangerous is kissing?Job motivation: how the powerful steal from the stupid.Comment
-
Coming soon to your local council:
The Munching Outreach Co-ordinators!
Seriously though...is there anything left that is safe?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment