Bum. Posted twice. I blame the government.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
New tax about to be introduced
Collapse
X
-
bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson) -
When I said there were two things that need to be charged for, I of course meant 3. (I realised this at the time but decided not to complicate things by including the third.)
The three are
1.) "Negative Externalities" of fossil fuel use
2.) Congestion
3.) Cost of roads
Fossil fuel use is best charged for by a tax on fuel, for the reasons I gave.
Originally posted by xoggothsurely "congestion" implies occupation of road that impedes others and therefore applies on some routes not others.
The cost of roads is what I left out. I gather the government is thinking of replacing road tax with tax collected via the same mechanism as the congestion charge. Actually I think this is quite sensible, assuming they do it in the way I think they should. What they should do is divide the cost of every bit of road among those that use it. It means that heavily used roads will cost bugger all to use because the costs are spread between so many. On the other hand, roads in the remotest parts of Scotland that only see one car an hour will cost a lot more per mile in road cost.
So the bill per mile will have two completely separate charges built into it. Travelling on the M4 into London during the morning rush-hour will cost you bugger-all in road cost but a fortune in congestion charge. That hypothetical Scottish road will cost you nothing in congestion charges but hundreds or thousands of times as much in road cost. (e.g. 50p a mile road cost in Scotland versus 0.1p for M4, to make up an example.)
The beauty of this is that everyone pays for what they use, and one part of the country isn't subsidising the other.
Once this is all in place, planners only have to look where congestion charge is high to know where they should (if possible) be doing more roadbuilding (e.g. bypasses, widen roads, etc.) The program of road building need in no way be constrained by government finances because the users of the new roads will pay for them.
I imagine there will be places where the congestion charge will be so high that it will be clear there is economic justification for buying up properties and demolishing them to make more room for roads.Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 13 May 2006, 20:49.Comment
-
Sure I have posted this before but here goes again:
Divide and Rule Strategy applies.
First Stage: Scumverment says "It will only be charged on the 5% of 'congested roads' and we will drop fuel duty". As a result loads of people will think 'IT IS GOOD' and they think they will save money. Now it is introduced as 80% of people think they want it, with attendant drop in fuel duty.
Second Stage: It is applied to all motorways and main roues into cities.
Third Stage: Lots of people think, sh1t I'm paying a fortune and move off the motorways and main routes onto A roads and side streets. These are now congested and hey-presto become chargeable.
Fourth Stage: Climate change levy super extra tax is added to fuel, about the same as current fuel duty or more. Scumvernemnt claims this is to save the world and is enforced by some international treaty or other and anway the Tories did it and ran away.
Woo-Hoo now you pay loads more every day to get to work and do you think the buses and trains will get cheaper? NO Climate change levy super extra tax and congestion charges will apply to them too! Kerching, Gordon's bungfund for the chavs gets big enough to buy yet another election with extra benefits.Comment
-
"And as we travel more, because we live on a crowded island, congestion is set to grow, so if we do nothing we simply face eternal gridlock," he told BBC News.
There's an obvious area of policy we need to address in that case to avoid exacerbating the problem.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
There's an obvious area of policy we need to address in that case to avoid exacerbating the problem
Indeed there is, Xog.
*** The Great Land Reclamation Project *** (copyright BGG 2006)
1. Build a big wall from the Mull of Kintyre in Scotland, westwards, to Ballycastle in Northern Ireland.
2. Build a big wall from the Ramsey in Wales, north westwards, to Wexford in Southern Ireland.
3. Pump out all the water.
4. Voila ! Lots of new land to play with !
Thank you very much :-)Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Originally posted by xoggoth"And as we travel more, because we live on a crowded island, congestion is set to grow, so if we do nothing we simply face eternal gridlock," he told BBC News.
There's an obvious area of policy we need to address in that case to avoid exacerbating the problem.Comment
-
Originally posted by wendigo100So obvious, yet no-one must mention it on pain of being called a racist.
Ironically I got a REAL bollocking for being racist and naughty for reading Mein Kampf on the tube a few months ago. This is rediculous!!! It has to stop!!!Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment