Originally posted by doodab
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cameron hint over child benefit cuts for better-off
Collapse
X
-
They're wbankers as well so don't encourage them to breed.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
I'm just pointing out that someone else pointed out that they don't really need child benefit.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThey're wbankers as well so don't encourage them to breed.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Surely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too muchIn Scooter we trust
Comment
-
or uninsuredOriginally posted by The Spartan View PostSurely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too muchComment
-
Originally posted by The Spartan View PostSurely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too much
Not sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.
I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman
The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bacchus View PostNot sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.
I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman
The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
IPhone 4S and IPADOriginally posted by The Spartan View PostThough that maybe true it is often those on benefits that can afford those luxuries
FTFYVote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
Why blame the messenger ? Why was the govt giving out tokens that Tescos can take for fags ? Its these politicians that need to be shot for introducing half measures and cant be arsed to do anything properly.Originally posted by Bacchus View PostNot sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.
I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman
The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"
Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
That's only a short term worry, if long-term it encourages people to grow up with a work ethic.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostThe question is how much would it cost to means test these benefits, any savings would be lost be the bureaucracy that comes with it.
No, it would be cruel and monstrous. If you get no extra benefits for having kids, how should you feed them? All very well to say "they shouldn't have had the kids" but once the kids are born, is it humane to allow them to suffer as a punishment on the parents?Originally posted by Bacchus View PostIt is crazy to give taxpayer's money to people just because they have children; child benefit is a hangover from WW2 but no government has had the cahoonies to get rid of it because it would be politically unpopular
Otherwise we're back in the Dickens days... street kids begging and stealing, or like the introduction to Slumdog Millionaire.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I've probably said this hundreds if not thousands of times but here goes again. All the government should do is issue them with a card (much like a normal chip and pin one) and instead of receiving cash their money gets added to the card. This card can then be used to purchase essential items only, so when you try to use it to pay for alcohol, cigarettes, petrol and anything classified as a luxury item perfume etc it will be declined.In Scooter we trust
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment