• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cameron hint over child benefit cuts for better-off

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    I think the point he was making is that the denizens of Richmond don't need child benefit because they are loaded.
    They're wbankers as well so don't encourage them to breed.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      They're wbankers as well so don't encourage them to breed.
      I'm just pointing out that someone else pointed out that they don't really need child benefit.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #33
        Surely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too much
        In Scooter we trust

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
          Surely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too much
          or uninsured
          Anti-bedwetting advice

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
            Surely if you can afford to buy a car and run it and you are on benefits then you must be getting too much

            Not sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.

            I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman

            The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Bacchus View Post
              Not sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.

              I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman

              The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
                Though that maybe true it is often those on benefits that can afford those luxuries
                IPhone 4S and IPAD

                FTFY
                Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Bacchus View Post
                  Not sure until what age, but "benefits mums" also get milk tokens to provide baby with at least one healthy pint of milk per day.

                  I know this because I used to canvas for dairies in the high street, and these should have been a knock-down sale because they can just hand over the token to the milkman

                  The most common response was that "tescos take them for fags"
                  Why blame the messenger ? Why was the govt giving out tokens that Tescos can take for fags ? Its these politicians that need to be shot for introducing half measures and cant be arsed to do anything properly.
                  Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
                    The question is how much would it cost to means test these benefits, any savings would be lost be the bureaucracy that comes with it.
                    That's only a short term worry, if long-term it encourages people to grow up with a work ethic.

                    Originally posted by Bacchus View Post
                    It is crazy to give taxpayer's money to people just because they have children; child benefit is a hangover from WW2 but no government has had the cahoonies to get rid of it because it would be politically unpopular
                    No, it would be cruel and monstrous. If you get no extra benefits for having kids, how should you feed them? All very well to say "they shouldn't have had the kids" but once the kids are born, is it humane to allow them to suffer as a punishment on the parents?

                    Otherwise we're back in the Dickens days... street kids begging and stealing, or like the introduction to Slumdog Millionaire.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #40
                      I've probably said this hundreds if not thousands of times but here goes again. All the government should do is issue them with a card (much like a normal chip and pin one) and instead of receiving cash their money gets added to the card. This card can then be used to purchase essential items only, so when you try to use it to pay for alcohol, cigarettes, petrol and anything classified as a luxury item perfume etc it will be declined.
                      In Scooter we trust

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X