Originally posted by Wilmslow
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Got myself in trouble….
Collapse
X
-
If you enjoy getting involved in office politics, then I'd suggest you return to perm. Personally, if my client wants me to pay me for sitting in usually pointless meeting all day - fine with me. -
"Decline"Originally posted by Wilmslow View PostGot an invite for a meeting ending at 6:30pm.
Given this is after an all day meeting starting at 8am…..
Job done.Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
He is perm.Originally posted by keninparis View PostIf you enjoy getting involved in office politics, then I'd suggest you return to perm. Personally, if my client wants me to pay me for sitting in usually pointless meeting all day - fine with me.Comment
-
Makes sense now. Hope it stays that way (although could be on the market sooner rather than later).Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostHe is perm.Comment
-
Its pretty obvious she wants you.
Apart from that, the first email is a bit of an overreaction for a second division 'swear' word, hardly above 'damn', but nevertheless, not to be used with people you don't know, particularly your betters. She could just have been laying down boundaries, fair enough.
But the second email is well out of order, but may get you some cred from your co workers. Taking it to HR may backfire as its an overreaction and she will hold it against you - file it for later use if necessary.
Apologising in the first instance may have been correct, but after the second email you will just look weak if you roll over. Have some diplomatic retort about 'as much as you regret...etc. public admonishment is no more acceptable than mild swear words' if she raises it again. But better thought out, and put through your line manager. In fact your line manager should be raising the public slanging match thing with her anyway.
You should have just said no, unless its urgent, you're going home as you've been in the office since what o'clock. But without swearing.
Office politics, its a ****er, eh?Comment
-
An alternative would be to walk over to where she sits, throw some jam-rags on her desk and say "You're obviously in need of these, love. We'll have a chat about this situation when you're a bit more rational! In the meantime put the ******* kettle on and make me a cup of tea!"Originally posted by Clever Hans View PostIts pretty obvious she wants you.
Apart from that, the first email is a bit of an overreaction for a second division 'swear' word, hardly above 'damn', but nevertheless, not to be used with people you don't know, particularly your betters. She could just have been laying down boundaries, fair enough.
But the second email is well out of order, but may get you some cred from your co workers. Taking it to HR may backfire as its an overreaction and she will hold it against you - file it for later use if necessary.
Apologising in the first instance may have been correct, but after the second email you will just look weak if you roll over. Have some diplomatic retort about 'as much as you regret...etc. public admonishment is no more acceptable than mild swear words' if she raises it again. But better thought out, and put through your line manager. In fact your line manager should be raising the public slanging match thing with her anyway.
You should have just said no, unless its urgent, you're going home as you've been in the office since what o'clock. But without swearing.
Office politics, its a ****er, eh?
Churhill - In "The Gospel According to Gene Hunt!" mode.Comment
-
That approach works with CM does it?Originally posted by Churchill View PostAn alternative would be to walk over to where she sits, throw some jam-rags on her desk and say "You're obviously in need of these, love. We'll have a chat about this situation when you're a bit more rational! In the meantime put the ******* kettle on and make me a cup of tea!"
Churhill - In "The Gospel According to Gene Hunt!" mode.Comment
-
Yep, she duly arrives with tea and biscuits.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThat approach works with CM does it?
You see chaps, women are almost human, they don't take much training at all.Comment
-
I always thought they were more like carpets than human (lay them right first time etcetc.)Originally posted by Churchill View PostYep, she duly arrives with tea and biscuits.
You see chaps, women are almost human, they don't take much training at all.Comment
-
You're heading out of what's acheivable, remember who the OP is...Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI always thought they were more like carpets than human (lay them right first time etcetc.)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Comment