Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
-
You're right. -
Originally posted by pjclarkeBS - Most cited authors on climate change
Percentage of professional scientific bodies that have not endorsed the IPCC ... 0%.
That CV is way out of date, btw I am now a rescue diver
.
Comment
-
BS - Most cited authors on climate change
Percentage of professional scientific bodies that have not endorsed the IPCC ... 0%.
That CV is way out of date, btw I am now a rescue diver .
Climatic Research Unit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yeah they call it "Sciences", the green anorak brigade from the Geography dept.The CRU was founded in 1971 as part of the university's School of Environmental Sciences.
Should try reading round instead of reading all that propoganda.Last edited by BlasterBates; 11 October 2011, 10:25.I'm alright JackComment
-
The CAGW movement has some genuine adherants, but they are mostly 'Watermelons'
green on the outside but red on the inside. Senior members of the IPCC are on record as saying that its not about climate any more, if it ever was. It's about redistribution of wealth and power.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
-
I think you will find that opinions on global warming are based on who the people are with the views. The "entitlement" brigade of people who live off the endeavours of others (socialists, governments, public sector bodies) along with the attention seekers (greenpeace, tree huggers) are in favour of it (Global warming that is).Originally posted by pjclarkeBS - Most cited authors on climate change
Percentage of professional scientific bodies that have not endorsed the IPCC ... 0%.
That CV is way out of date, btw I am now a rescue diver.
Whereas those of us who believe in taking responsibility for our lives and believe in free markets do not believe in it. Nothing to do therefore with anything scientific.Last edited by DodgyAgent; 11 October 2011, 11:13.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...act_id=1871503
On the whole, the most scientifically literate and numerate subjects were slightly less likely, not more, to see climate change as a serious threat than the least scientifically literate and numerate ones.
...in other words
AGW believers tend to be as thick as pigsh*t.I'm alright JackComment
-
Thing is PJ is producing evidence and the rest of you are attacking him ad hominem.
BB, aren't you the thicko who told us you have some kind of dumbed down OU degree?
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
sorry TW. it got a bit busy for a while here.Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
co chair of the IPCC - its not about the environment any more
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Phew! It's alright, pj's here to fight his cornerOriginally posted by pjclarke
(I know it's wrong but I'm starting to warm to him )
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
Comment