Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
England V France
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
True - I guess you can be very good at what you do but have everyone hate you anyway.Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010 -
It's an approach, but I don't think it's always right. I'd like to see more mauls at the breakdown instead of rucks, building pressure and rolling so that the fly half gets the ball going forward at a defense that's back pedalling; can be more effective than the so-called ' quick ball' approach, but you need the right players to do it.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostHe never stands flat on the gain line, and the closer you can play to it the less momentum opposition backs have to line up and close down attackers.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I don't think the players hated him. I think some of them hated Rob Andrew after the 91 cup final though.Originally posted by cailin maith View PostTrue - I guess you can be very good at what you do but have everyone hate you anyway.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Guscott and Brian Moore couldnt stand himOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think the players hated him. I think some of them hated Rob Andrew after the 91 cup final though.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
20th century thinking. The smart teams are not contesting the breakdowns very heavily, so they have more people to attack the recycled ball, usually on their side of the gain line.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIt's an approach, but I don't think it's always right. I'd like to see more mauls at the breakdown instead of rucks, building pressure and rolling so that the fly half gets the ball going forward at a defense that's back pedalling; can be more effective than the so-called ' quick ball' approach, but you need the right players to do it.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Moore didn't like him, but happily put his body on the line for him.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostGuscott and Brian Moore couldnt stand him
As for Guscott; don't start me on that individual. I might say some unpleasant things.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIt's an approach, but I don't think it's always right. I'd like to see more mauls at the breakdown instead of rucks, building pressure and rolling so that the fly half gets the ball going forward at a defense that's back pedalling; can be more effective than the so-called ' quick ball' approach, but you need the right players to do it.
Fair enough, I know you forwards like to huddle together as much as you can
. I still maintain that Wilkinson is not good enough to play for England and that his selection is down to the safety feeling and tactics that the Leicester dominated coaching team want England to play to
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
They're not contesting the breakdowns because they're rucks, and you can't do anything to win the ball without being penalized. A team that can play rolling mauls can expose them.Originally posted by malvolio View Post20th century thinking. The smart teams are not contesting the breakdowns very heavily, so they have more people to attack the recycled ball, usually on their side of the gain line.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Send an email to Martin Johnson!Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThey're not contesting the breakdowns because they're rucks, and you can't do anything to win the ball without being penalized. A team that can play rolling mauls can expose them.Comment
-
If anyone knows, does, and I expect we might see some Leicesterish tactics from the forwards.Originally posted by Churchill View PostSend an email to Martin Johnson!And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment