Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Rules of contracting
Collapse
X
-
-
If that's how you feel about agents, you are in the wrong game, expect to spend time on the bench.Originally posted by craig1 View PostFTFY.
HTHFiscal nomad it's legal.Comment
-
Originally posted by alreadypacked View PostIf that's how you feel about agents, you are in the wrong game, expect to spend time on the bench.
HTH
Comment
-
Rule #9
Use language that only contractors can understand, terms such as "Bob", "Bench Time", "Tulip" etcComment
-
Rule #10
If getting a bollacking from a pshyco permi boss, feeling smug that your earning a lot more money than them.Comment
-
Ok, we will happily add this one to the list, when the industry raises its bar to keep ex Dixons staff and double glazing salesmen firmly out of the game.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostTrust all recruitment agents, give up your references without waiting to be asked or told.
It's not that we mind providing sales leads for you. However when a snot nosed weasel rings you up in the middle of the day and tries to lie at you in a form that you have seen 100 time before. You start to think: "If Mr X finds out that I set this little Muppet on him, will he thank me or personally come and kick me in the head... "
Most of the clowns that try the "need references" route are the very idiots that I don't want my name associated with. However the question: "What else is going on?", will regularly get you some names of firms that didn't want my cv. If only because you might actually have the right candidate for them and you had the decency to ask.
Comment
-
Nobody's named my number 1 rule; never discuss money with or in the presence of permies.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
whsOriginally posted by bobspud View PostOk, we will happily add this one to the list, when the industry raises its bar to keep ex Dixons staff and double glazing salesmen firmly out of the game.
It's not that we mind providing sales leads for you. However when a snot nosed weasel rings you up in the middle of the day and tries to lie at you in a form that you have seen 100 time before. You start to think: "If Mr X finds out that I set this little Muppet on him, will he thank me or personally come and kick me in the head... "
Most of the clowns that try the "need references" route are the very idiots that I don't want my name associated with. However the question: "What else is going on?", will regularly get you some names of firms that didn't want my cv. If only because you might actually have the right candidate for them and you had the decency to ask.
If an agent calls me and just asks what I know about the testing market I'm happy to help on the basis of ' you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours'. But don't give me that '2 references' bollux.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Doing that at the moment as its a corker of a bad decision because the PM doesn't want to annoy 1 person.Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post#10 Cover your ass, always document silly decisions*.
(other people have made)
They company won't realise for a couple of years but when they do its a biggie. Where does life threatening and share price destroying fit in the risk matrix?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
If they won't notice for a couple of years then nobody's bonus will be affected, so it isn't a risk.Originally posted by eek View PostThey company won't realise for a couple of years but when they do its a biggie. Where does life threatening and share price destroying fit in the risk matrix?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Today 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Yesterday 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03

Comment