Originally posted by doodab
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Footballer sues Twitter
Collapse
X
-
What is the name of that Irish airline?"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Comment
-
Like this?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThe kids of the guy are going to get bullied for the fact that their dad hides it rather than the fact that he's cheated. Remember kids have screwed morals. Plus judges etc. forget that kids are better at using online resources and social media than they are.
An England footballer has taken legal action to prevent The News Grind from revealing he had been faithful throughout his married life.
He has taken out a super-injunction which blocks the reporting of personal details about the star, who is in his twenties.
But an eleventh-hour legal challenge has allowed us to report some of the sensitive information without identifying the Premier League player.
The star, referred to in official court papers as ‘soft lad’ has been happily married for more than 12 months and never strayed.
His legal team argued that millions of pounds of sponsorship deals could be in jeopardy if details about his private life were reported.
A source close to the player said: “What sort of reputation would he have within the football world if everyone knew he loved his wife and wasn’t trying it on with WAG wannabees?Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
...and it seems that a journalist is now in trouble for having named said footballer on Twitter, but we're not supposed to name the journalist (Giles Coren) either
Comment
-
Are we allowed to know you wrote that?Originally posted by CENSORED View Post...and it seems that a journalist is now in trouble for having named said footballer on Twitter, but we're not supposed to name the journalist (censored) either
My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
-
They were saying on R4 this morning that by asking for the details of the twits who posted the players name (61665) they have inadvertently prompted thousands more twits to post it too, they're calling it the 'Spartacus Effect'.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I was wondering if any action could actually be taken against these twittering people, most of whom are presumably just members of the public. I don't see how the injunction can apply to them, as they were never actually served with it and while they might suspect it applied to the person being discussed they didn't actually know for certain.
If they were threatened with legal action, surely that would result in a strong argument for overturning the original injunction as it would be in the public interest to avoid tying up the courts with prosecuting tens of thousands of people for tweeting about something that no-one really gives a tulip about anyway.
Either way, aren't professional footballers a right bunch of cocks.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Rumour has it that Fabio Capello has taken legal advice and won't be naming [REDACTED] in the squad for the Switzerland game.
<yes, of course it's recycled>While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I thought the player in question (why aren't we naming them?) was one of the boring, clean, professional ones.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Good question. Admin, can we have some clarification on whether we are risking a ticking off?Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhy aren't we naming them?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment