• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

They finally got him!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    So, no pictures, video, dna proof or evidence of any kind and the body was quickly dumped in the sea?

    I smell bullsh1t! Either they've done a deal to let him go free or he died some time ago and this is just a contrived way to announce it. The Americans are lying. This really doesn't smell right.
    Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by russell View Post
      Yeah and 72 in one night? I think there would be some wastage. Give me 3 hot pronstars.

      Yeah if I had to choose a religion I'd rather be with Charlie Sheen's. Two pornstars beats 72 virgins any way you look at it, providing they're fresh to the game and not done over with fake boobs and kipper lips.

      Maybe Charlie should start his own cult. Scientology or Kabbalah don't interest me, even if some 'superstar celebrities' try to brainwash me otherwise.
      Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
      Feist - I Feel It All
      Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by wobbegong View Post

        A crude fake. The bottom half of the face is at the wrong angle to the top half. Here's the probable donor picture . . .



        Don't forget, that might be his son, who they're saying was also killed.

        Not sure when the second pic was taken (the one in the quote), but if that was some years ago then the beard of the dead guy looks too dark to be Osama (and muslims aren't supposed to dye their hair or beards.)

        But the blurred picture refutation is bollox - It was probably taken at top speed with a helmet camera, with smoke swirling about. So you can't expect photo journalist picture quality.
        Last edited by OwlHoot; 2 May 2011, 10:39.
        Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
          A crude fake. The bottom half of the face is at the wrong angle to the top half. Here's the probable donor picture . . .



          Yep. Breathtaking that the media and the US think they can lie so obviously.

          Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

          Comment


            #35
            Good news if true, but it would have been much better if he was taken alive.

            Comment


              #36
              How do we know these pictures are official releases anyway?

              For all we know they are deliberately crude fakes cooked up and disseminated by the terrorists themselves or their sympathisers to sow doubt and confusion.
              Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                How do we know these pictures are official releases anyway?

                For all we know they are deliberately crude fakes cooked up and disseminated by the terrorists themselves or their sympathisers to sow doubt and confusion.
                No no no.
                The US will always release all facts of any operation they have done.
                If anyone says the picture is bad then obviously there is a conspiracy and it didn't happen.

                Morons
                "Condoms should come with a free pack of earplugs."

                Comment


                  #38
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                    How do we know these pictures are official releases anyway?

                    For all we know they are deliberately crude fakes cooked up and disseminated by the daily mail or their sympathisers to sow doubt and confusion.
                    FTFY
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                      How do we know these pictures are official releases anyway?

                      For all we know they are deliberately crude fakes cooked up and disseminated by the terrorists themselves or their sympathisers to sow doubt and confusion.
                      They were the ones I saw on Sky News, think they might have been from Pakistanis not the USA. Lets assume they aren't the official ones, they should release the pictures unless his head was blow clean off.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X