- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More Green news
Collapse
X
-
-
But if we don't rape the rainforests to grow crops for biofuels and let millions of people starve, then in 1000's of years time it might be a tiny bit warmer, and then we'd all be dead if we kept our jumpers on?Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
-
95% of the internet is tulip
'Doctor's warn'. Or do they? This is based on an article on the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JPANDS). Sounds like a legitimate source, but here is the wiki entry...
Hmmmm. That said, there is a grain of truth ... first generation biofuels have been pretty much a disaster and Greens have been warning that this would be the case since at least 2004.The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is not listed in major academic literature databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed[37] nor the Web of Science.[38] The National Library of Medicine declined repeated requests from AAPS to index the journal, citing unspecified concerns.[3] Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims,[3] including:
* that the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unconstitutional;[39]
* that "humanists" have conspired to replace the "creation religion of Jehovah" with evolution;[40]
* that human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus not a cause for concern;[41]
* that HIV does not cause AIDS;[42][43]
* that the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[44]
Most of the blame lies with AgriBusiness, the EU bureacracy and the US Government, George Bush especially set ambitious targets for the adoption of bioethanol as a way of further subsidising his mates in the oil industry. If you account properly for all the energy costs required to make the stuff from the oil-based fertilisers through to the energy needed to run the refineries, 1st generation biofuels actually consume more energy than they release, so canny oil companies have been reprofiling themselves as 'green energy' producers and investing hundreds of millions of $ in R&D and their production.
Second gen fuels from non-food crops, crop residues and waste show more promise, tho.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Comment