• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: More Green news

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More Green news"

Collapse

  • pjclarke
    replied
    95% of the internet is tulip

    'Doctor's warn'. Or do they? This is based on an article on the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JPANDS). Sounds like a legitimate source, but here is the wiki entry...

    The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is not listed in major academic literature databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed[37] nor the Web of Science.[38] The National Library of Medicine declined repeated requests from AAPS to index the journal, citing unspecified concerns.[3] Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of non-mainstream or scientifically discredited claims,[3] including:

    * that the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are unconstitutional;[39]
    * that "humanists" have conspired to replace the "creation religion of Jehovah" with evolution;[40]
    * that human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus not a cause for concern;[41]
    * that HIV does not cause AIDS;[42][43]
    * that the "gay male lifestyle" shortens life expectancy by 20 years.[44]
    Hmmmm. That said, there is a grain of truth ... first generation biofuels have been pretty much a disaster and Greens have been warning that this would be the case since at least 2004.

    Most of the blame lies with AgriBusiness, the EU bureacracy and the US Government, George Bush especially set ambitious targets for the adoption of bioethanol as a way of further subsidising his mates in the oil industry. If you account properly for all the energy costs required to make the stuff from the oil-based fertilisers through to the energy needed to run the refineries, 1st generation biofuels actually consume more energy than they release, so canny oil companies have been reprofiling themselves as 'green energy' producers and investing hundreds of millions of $ in R&D and their production.

    Second gen fuels from non-food crops, crop residues and waste show more promise, tho.
    Last edited by pjclarke; 19 April 2011, 20:12. Reason: SP

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    But if we don't rape the rainforests to grow crops for biofuels and let millions of people starve, then in 1000's of years time it might be a tiny bit warmer, and then we'd all be dead if we kept our jumpers on?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    started a topic More Green news

    More Green news

    Doctors Warn that Biofuel Could Cause Mass Deaths Around the World

Working...
X