Its true, only law abiding citizens are locked up

**DimPrawn** · 14 March 2006, 17:43

12 months?

They'll be out in six.

Tough on cr...............sod it.

**Mordac** · 14 March 2006, 18:45

Tough on.....easy targets; roughly sums it up.

**Fungus** · 14 March 2006, 19:26

Originally posted by Mailman

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/4805678.stm

12 months for murder? Why bother with a hearing if thats all scum like this are going to get.

Mailman

Quite. The judge said:

"He met his death at your hands and you will have to live with that for the rest of your lives."

He must be a very naive person to think that the young thugs give a damn. Oh except that their barrister will have made sure they dress smart, and have tutored them to make them appear contrite when in court.

**Dundeegeorge** · 14 March 2006, 19:29

contrite as opposed to riteconts

Originally posted by Fungus

Quite. The judge said:

"He met his death at your hands and you will have to live with that for the rest of your lives."

He must be a very naive person to think that the young thugs give a damn. Oh except that their barrister will have made sure they dress smart, and have tutored them to make them appear contrite when in court.

Can I say that? Oh, I just did. Hmnn, that sounds familiar!

**vista** · 14 March 2006, 23:00

This sh 1t hole

Originally posted by Mailman

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/4805678.stm

12 months for murder? Why bother with a hearing if thats all scum like this are going to get.

Mailman

is long overdue a revolution .... scum judges and politicians up against the wall with the socialist/marxist/communist scum a close second.

**Fungus** · 14 March 2006, 23:07

Originally posted by vista

is long overdue a revolution .... scum judges and politicians up against the wall with the socialist/marxist/communist scum a close second.

The only thing that you can be sure of is that the judge and the barristers all made a tidy sum from the trial. Barristers are on more than £200 per hour.

**xoggoth** · 14 March 2006, 23:09

Looking at it in a slighlty more detached way, hard to say from that brief report whether they deserved a harsher sentence or not. Did they just film him being pushed in or did they film him drowning? Did they have any idea he couldn't swim? did they make any attempt to rescue him when they realised he was in difficulty? Anybody got any more details?

**vista** · 14 March 2006, 23:17

Originally posted by xoggoth

Looking at it in a slighlty more detached way, hard to say from that brief report whether they deserved a harsher sentence or not. Did they just film him being pushed in or did they film him drowning? Did they have any idea he couldn't swim? did they make any attempt to rescue him when they realised he was in difficulty? Anybody got any more details?

Stop hugging the trees and try to stop bed wetting ;-)

his honourable tos s pot "index linked pension off our taxes" said "he met his death at your hands" not sure how much more detail is needed unless you're a ghoul.

NB: bit p1ssed so all comments should be taken as booze assited.

**Mailman** · 15 March 2006, 09:42

I guess the only reason these scum didnt get done for murder was that they most likely didnt intend to kill the poor sap.

BUT...I say...cut their heads off. After all, its only fair!

Mailman

Its true, only law abiding citizens are locked up