If it was me life expectancy about 80, whether I die at 82 or 80 doesn't make a whole lot of difference to be honest. Let's put it this way, it wouldn't be waking up in a "cold sweat" at night.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The future of Nuclear power
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIf it was me life expectancy about 80, whether I die at 82 or 80 doesn't make a whole lot of difference to be honest. Let's put it this way, it wouldn't be waking up in a "cold sweat" at night.Comment
-
At Chernobyl they were subjected to at least 10 times the levels of the Japanese, some of them more like 100 times, that is indeed deadly. If you are subjected to levels 10 times the level they are subjected to now then yes they may indeed die in 2 years. However they haven't been, so provided that these workers don't work in a Nuclear power plant for the rest of their lives, then their life expectancy won't be shortened at all. The longterm effects of radiation are accumulative so you can have a higher dose now and then stop. From what I understand the highest dose that one worker got was 100 millSieverts. In CHernobyl the liquidators received beween 1000 and 14000.Last edited by BlasterBates; 17 March 2011, 17:48.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostHow in your right mind you can assume that workers there will lose only 2 years of their lifes??!?! Some of them will be lucky to live next 2 years, that I say on the basis of Chernobyl disaster which this one is much worse even though defensive measures are better.Comment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI heard they were sending old people in. I agree with you about radiation levels, I think it's a given that will be covered up, as they always are.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostBut don't you think the vomiting, body swelling up and hair falling out might not be a bit of a give away?
it was the lager
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostBut don't you think the vomiting, body swelling up and hair falling out might not be a bit of a give away?
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostBut don't you think the vomiting, body swelling up and hair falling out might not be a bit of a give away?Comment
-
Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostSo a lot like binge-drinking then?
While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostBut don't you think the vomiting, body swelling up and hair falling out might not be a bit of a give away?
On August 29, 2002, the government of Japan revealed that TEPCO was guilty of false reporting in routine governmental inspection of its nuclear plants and systematic concealment of plant safety incidents. All seventeen of its boiling-water reactors were shut down for inspection as a result. TEPCO's chairman Hiroshi Araki, President Nobuya Minami, Vice-President Toshiaki Enomoto, as well as the advisers Shō Nasu and Gaishi Hiraiwa stepped-down by September 30, 2002.[7] The utility "eventually admitted to two hundred occasions over more than two decades between 1977 and 2002, involving the submission of false technical data to authorities".[8] Upon taking over leadership responsibilities, TEPCO's new president issued a public commitment that the company would take all the countermeasures necessary to prevent fraud and restore the nation's confidence. By the end of 2005, generation at suspended plants had been restarted, with government approval.
In 2007, however, the company announced to the public that an internal investigation had revealed a large number of unreported incidents. These included an unexpected unit criticality in 1978 and additional systematic false reporting, which had not been uncovered during the 2002 inquiry. Along with scandals at other Japanese electric companies, this failure to ensure corporate compliance resulted in strong public criticism of Japan's electric power industry and the nation's nuclear energy policy. Again, the company made no effort to identify those responsible.
Tokyo Electric Power Company - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Jan 9 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Comment