Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Many of the problems were preventable. The Japanese practices were plain stupid, close packing of spent materials all round the reactor, and why not put the reactors themselves below sea level to allow flooding if necessary?
Green generation "solutions" are not solutions at all, they are unreliable, hugely expensive and themselves very damaging to the environment. The number of deaths worlwide directly from accidents in the oil and coal industries plus indirectly from pollution due to burning fossil fuels is huge.
A few nuclear reactors next to each other proper blown up, workers struggle to cool them for days - finally have to leave because radiation will pretty much kill them in a few hours (like those who were send to deal with Chernobyl with spades without explanations). The crisis still continues and there is no obvious end to it anytime soon.
So this makes my position is indefensible but the guys who claim "it's all right they will just die 2 years earlier" have perfectly defensible point of view.
Do you read the Daily Mail?
Your grasp of reality is shocking for somebody who manages to run a seemingly successful business.
"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."
Well, so far it seems that, whatever "plain stupid" practices they were employing, a nuclear installation located close to the epicentre of the largest quake ever measured in Japan has survived with no major loss of life or radioactive catastrophe. Obviously it isn't "nothing to worry about" but it's not conclusive evidence that nuclear power is a disaster waiting to happen either, although the media have had a field day with it and will no doubt continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
Hopefully everything will start to look a little less bleak once power is restored...
Well, so far it seems that, whatever "plain stupid" practices they were employing, a nuclear installation located close to the epicentre of the largest quake ever measured in Japan has survived with no major loss of life or radioactive catastrophe. Obviously it isn't "nothing to worry about" but it's not conclusive evidence that nuclear power is a disaster waiting to happen either, although the media have had a field day with it and will no doubt continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
Hopefully everything will start to look a little less bleak once power is restored...
a lot of things are done with an eyeball on what will happen if it all goes horribly wrong. Most things are built to be fail safe.
just because the stations have failed safely so far, is no reason to get cocky. they should have, and the fact that there is any doubt is the real concern
apart from that, I too am optimistic
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work
A Tepco worker was taken to hospital after collapsing and experiencing chest pains.
Hmm, could be anything.
Two Tepco workers felt ill whilst working in the control rooms of Fukushima Daiichi
Food poisoning?
One Tepco worker working within the reactor building of Fukushima Daiichi unit 3 during "vent work" was taken to hospital after receiving radiation exposure exceeding 100 mSv, a level deemed acceptable in emergency situations by some national nuclear safety regulators.
"Over 100", probably 101.
An unspecified number of firemen who were exposed to radiation are under investigation.
Heap loads of hysteria in most newspapers, especially the German newspapers, who are now expecting Tsunami's to go sweeping across their landlocked country.
Let's recap the death toll of this catastrophe is ?
The answer is 0.
The 50 workers have been subjected to no more than twice the normal dose they get anyway.
...and the radioactivity, all short bursts that decay due to irradiated steam.
May I suggest that those workers who smoke, stop smoking and then increase their life expectancy by about 15 years. I think 40% of the Japanese population smoke.
Germany has had problems with major floods in the past. Different, but worth considering nonetheless.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Comment