I am speaking from a position of ignorance here but given we've got all these fuel rods going into meltdown and spewing out radiation because they are all reacting with each other, why not drop a bomb on them and scatter the rods so they stop the chain reaction and can be dealt with seperately? Obviously, it's not a clean solution and will be a bugger to clean up but would it be the lesser of two evils?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Would blowing up Fukushima help?
Collapse
X
-
-
You are George Bush Jnr and I claim my £5What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions! -
Singhr, I have a feeling that the idea is to stop an explosion not cause one.Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
No, it would be more of a mess than the worst that can possibly happen if it all goes tits up.Originally posted by singhr View Postwould it be the lesser of two evils?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
At singhr's house.Originally posted by singhr View PostI am speaking from a position of ignorance here but given we've got all these fuel rods going into meltdown and spewing out radiation because they are all reacting with each other, why not drop a bomb on them and scatter the rods so they stop the chain reaction and can be dealt with seperately? Obviously, it's not a clean solution and will be a bugger to clean up but would it be the lesser of two evils?
singhr's SO : "Darling, I hate to tell you, but you've left a floater in the upstairs WC"
singhr : "No worries. Right on it." <packs WC with 2 kilos of semtex>Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
No, but feel free to blow up Slough. Or Almere, Lelystad or Barendrecht.Would blowing up Fukushima help?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Can we add Hull to that list ?
I've never been there, but I've not heard anyone have a good word to say about the place, and it just kind of feels "dirty" having a city lingering above the nice home counties that is a bit redundant.Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. LewisComment
-
Northampton and LutonOriginally posted by Board Game Geek View PostCan we add Hull to that list ?
I've never been there, but I've not heard anyone have a good word to say about the place, and it just kind of feels "dirty" having a city lingering above the nice home counties that is a bit redundant.Comment
-
If it's a serious question, the answer is this is a bad idea because it will release a LOT of radioactive material into the outside world. This is precisely what they're trying to stop, NOT a nuclear explosion. The melting rods are a problem because they make it harder to contain the nasty stuff, you end up having to encase it in concrete and just leave it a million years rather than dismantle in a proper way.Originally posted by singhr View PostI am speaking from a position of ignorance here but given we've got all these fuel rods going into meltdown and spewing out radiation because they are all reacting with each other, why not drop a bomb on them and scatter the rods so they stop the chain reaction and can be dealt with seperately? Obviously, it's not a clean solution and will be a bugger to clean up but would it be the lesser of two evils?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
When the Amercians were called in to Fukushima, the first thing they wanted to do is to bomb it, or anything. But they were only allowed to use water filled with acid and so have lost interest in that idea.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment