Why should everything be "balanced" exactly?
If it's a program about extremists it's a program about those extremists, is it really necessary to keep stating the obvious, that there are some of the same political viewpoint/religion/whatever who aren't so extreme?
The real problem is that people are too stupidly emotional and oversensitive, they take any valid criticism of some members of their group as an attack on all of them, any valid criticism of some practices as being against the creed as a whole. Unfortunately, that then gets taken as meaning that the group as whole supports those practices.
I think things would work better if everybody just said (within obvious limits) whatever they felt. How can there be a valid exchange of opinions if we prefilter everything we say?
If it's a program about extremists it's a program about those extremists, is it really necessary to keep stating the obvious, that there are some of the same political viewpoint/religion/whatever who aren't so extreme?
The real problem is that people are too stupidly emotional and oversensitive, they take any valid criticism of some members of their group as an attack on all of them, any valid criticism of some practices as being against the creed as a whole. Unfortunately, that then gets taken as meaning that the group as whole supports those practices.
I think things would work better if everybody just said (within obvious limits) whatever they felt. How can there be a valid exchange of opinions if we prefilter everything we say?

Comment