Originally posted by wobbegong
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This should raise the blood pressure
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
I agree if we're talking about custodial sentences. They should be the same, absolutely. But if you don't have the legal, automatic right to be here (i.e. British/EU citizenship) then that privilege to remain here should/could be revoked if the crime is serious enough. Whether this crime is serious enough to warrant that I'm not sure.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostI disagree the sentencing should be harsher. it should be the same.Comment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostGiven the publicity, he might be safer in Iraq.
I think you're right. It wouldn't surprise me to hear of his body being found in a skip shortly.Comment
-
One thing I couldn't tell from those who call this a travesty... is it the short prison sentence, or the lack of deportation? To me, failing to deport the guy is hardly a big deal.
On a slight tangent, if you are driving and you hit and kill someone, are you automatically guilty of a crime? e.g. if you are within the speed limit and not talking on your phone and some kid jumps out between parked cars.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
People with ILR, or a limited-leave, can have it revoked if they commit a serious crime whilst here. The UKBA has to apply to remove it (the leave)...which means the usual appeal process, and then the removal can also be appealed...so quite a lengthy process. But at least there is a process.Originally posted by GillsMan View PostI agree if we're talking about custodial sentences. They should be the same, absolutely. But if you don't have the legal, automatic right to be here (i.e. British/EU citizenship) then that privilege to remain here should/could be revoked if the crime is serious enough. Whether this crime is serious enough to warrant that I'm not sure.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
That is probably why he got a short sentence. The sentencing guidelines are available on the web for all these kind of driving offences. There are various mitigating and aggravating circumstances that dictate the sentence. Of course anything heard in a Magistrates court (where the Magistrates are not usually legally qualified) can be subject to extreme variation in sentencing for a similar offence depending on where when and who hears the case. Whether a driver who has done nothing wrong may be prosecuted is probably entirely down to luck.Originally posted by d000hg View PostOne thing I couldn't tell from those who call this a travesty... is it the short prison sentence, or the lack of deportation? To me, failing to deport the guy is hardly a big deal.
On a slight tangent, if you are driving and you hit and kill someone, are you automatically guilty of a crime? e.g. if you are within the speed limit and not talking on your phone and some kid jumps out between parked cars.
However as you allude to this guy is not being processed on his moral turpitude as a whole. When all things are considered it seems unjust but the law is working here on a case by case basis.The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
Putting the deportation issue aside for a moment, 4 months for killing a child is probably less time than you'd get for stealing.Comment
-
There was that case not so long ago of two kids playing on the M62 and being killed. I don't think anybody would have suggested the drivers were somehow to blame.Originally posted by d000hg View PostOn a slight tangent, if you are driving and you hit and kill someone, are you automatically guilty of a crime? e.g. if you are within the speed limit and not talking on your phone and some kid jumps out between parked cars.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
**** me I agree with AtW!Originally posted by AtW View PostListen - criminal loses a lot of rights, one of which right to remain where he is, right to see his family more than allowed by law etc.
That guy isn't even a citizen, he was here illegally and killed a young girl - managed to escape long jail sentence and now can remain here indefinately what a load of bollocks.
There is no human right to demand being able to remain or settle in this country - this area is controlled by immigration law, and so long as no torture involved or anything like this then deportation is in order.
Frankly any violent criminal who can be deported should be deported within hours of release....my quagmire of greed....my cesspit of laziness and unfairness....all I am doing is sticking two fingers up at nurses, doctors and other hard working employed professionals...
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment