Originally posted by Troll
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
McCanns sign Madeleine book deal
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Me too. No such thing as a dumb question when you are investigating something like that.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI find it bizarre that she didn't answer those questions,Comment
-
Undoubtedly. The salient difference being that in countries where the Police have the ability to tell the difference between their @rse and their elbow, the questions have some relevance to the enquiry in hand, and are not just cut and pasted from "Suspect Questioning for Dummies!"Originally posted by Troll View PostSurely any police investigation starts with asking questions
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
What's wrong with answering, open, closed, probing, leading questions? Any one of these can lead to an avenue of investigation that might otherwise not have been explored. In my opinion she did herself nor her missing child any good by not answering some of these.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostUndoubtedly. The salient difference being that in countries where the Police have the ability to tell the difference between their @rse and their elbow, the questions have some relevance to the enquiry in hand, and are not just cut and pasted from "Suspect Questioning for Dummies!"

Comment
-
Possibly. But in all honesty, the bulk of those questions would have done nothing to move the investigation forward. In abduction cases time is of the essence, and to hear the Plod laboriously ploughing through such clearly irrelevant guff, when it is quite possible your child was still somewhere in the locality, must have been infuriating.Originally posted by fckvwls View PostIn my opinion she did herself nor her missing child any good by not answering some of these.“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
As none of us know what happened I don't see how you can say that.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostBut in all honesty, the bulk of those questions would have done nothing to move the investigation forward.Comment
-
No doubt the McCanns will put their side of the story in the book. It won't stop idle speculation and outright accusations but it may help to explain the case from their perspective.Comment
-
-
According to the two news articles, these were questions asked after she was declared a formal suspect and are therefore (IMHO) more about securing a conviction than finding the poor lass.
It's a sad story indeed. The armchair CSI experts fueled by a media witch hunt should stick to their famous five books.Comment
-
That always sounded odd to me and she never really looked upset enough like a mother would after their kid had dissapeared. Of course I can't say that would make her guilty etc but to me it just looked odd and their hired car being found later with blood in it. To be honest I wouldn't be surprised if she killed her.
Originally posted by Troll View PostThe 48 questions she refused to answer
The one she did agree to answerComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Today 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Yesterday 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Comment