• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Open letter to Admin

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Pfffft. I really don't know why I am bothering with this. No sign of Wodder's IP addresses against any other user in the DB.

    Doesn't mean you're not a sockie though...

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      Yes. And if the IP address turns out to originate outside of the UK due to a 'hide my ass' style proxy. Then ban the owner as well.
      Using IP addresses to identify users (whether for banning or other reasons) has always been full of fail because of NAT. Given the growth in the use of mobile devices, where it's possible that enormous numbers of potential users might all appear to be at the same IP address, it has finally become completely useless unless you can prove that the IP address can be tied to a single physical connection to a single machine used by one person.

      As for "outside the UK": I've sometimes been using an O2 3G dongly thingy and had sites serve me the German version of their content, because O2 had NATted me through a German gateway. This happened when I was in Cambridge, which isn't part of Germany thanks to a few people putting a lot of effort in seventy years ago.

      I find it mildly amusing that, just when GeoIP had finally started getting into a form where it seemed almost usable, it's also become redundant due to changes in the way end user devices have their traffic routed by the big networks

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
        Using IP addresses to identify users (whether for banning or other reasons) has always been full of fail because of NAT. Given the growth in the use of mobile devices, where it's possible that enormous numbers of potential users might all appear to be at the same IP address, it has finally become completely useless unless you can prove that the IP address can be tied to a single physical connection to a single machine used by one person.

        As for "outside the UK": I've sometimes been using an O2 3G dongly thingy and had sites serve me the German version of their content, because O2 had NATted me through a German gateway. This happened when I was in Cambridge, which isn't part of Germany thanks to a few people putting a lot of effort in seventy years ago.

        I find it mildly amusing that, just when GeoIP had finally started getting into a form where it seemed almost usable, it's also become redundant due to changes in the way end user devices have their traffic routed by the big networks
        Enough of that techno bollox, should MF be banned or not?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
          Enough of that techno bollox, should MF be banned or not?
          And there ladies and gentlemen is the murderer!!!

          Nick has completely spolit my understanding of the Internet again! Last week he told me that two cups held together with string doesn't really work either.
          What happens in General, stays in General.
          You know what they say about assumptions!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
            And there ladies and gentlemen is the murderer!!!

            Nick has completely spolit my understanding of the Internet again! Last week he told me that two cups held together with string doesn't really work either.
            You think "Wodewick" is my sockie? Stop trying to deflect the blame.

            I've only had one "Sockie" (Churchill doesn't count) and that was "RRH is a raving felchlord" and I gave that one away. Can't remember who to...

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
              Using IP addresses to identify users (whether for banning or other reasons) has always been full of fail because of NAT.
              I always new he was a wrongun. Shifty and his eyes are too close together. Watch'im.
              Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                This happened when I was in Cambridge, which isn't part of Germany thanks to a few people putting a lot of effort in seventy years ago.


                BBC News - Funeral of WWII spy Eileen Nearne takes place in Devon

                One of those gallant "few". May she Rest in the Peace she helped secure for the rest of us.
                “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Wodewick View Post
                  Dear Sir
                  I joined this forum a few weeks ago after lurking for several months. During the months lurking I observed that pretty well every new poster was accused of being a sock puppet by many of the regular posters. It appears from anecdotal evidence that the board does have a history of sock puppets so I guess the accusations can be often be valid.

                  However I have now been an active member for a while and i am getting sick and tired of still being accused of being a sockie.

                  Is there something you can do to investigate and prove to the doubters that I am not a Sockie. Obviously if your investigation discovers that I a sockie I would expect no less than a public banning.

                  I would be grateful if you could update this thread with your findings.

                  Thanks
                  Wodewick
                  Sorry Dear,

                  While we won't ban you (because you haven't done anything wrong - just look at gricerboy) you are going to have to, in common parlance, 'Grow some'.

                  It is possible - even SY01 has done and I believe it's been the making of him.

                  Oh and btw,

                  Originally posted by Zippy View Post
                  I think that's a bit harsh. He hasn't tried to wind people up (much) or start bible-bashing.

                  Wodewick - running to the headmaster usually results in a kicking behind the bike sheds.
                  Very true.
                  "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                  - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                    I say ban anyone who isn't English. Yes English. So let's get rid of the Jocks, Paddies and Ruskies.... oh and the Northeners too, rough shabby lot.

                    Oh and while I'm at it, anyone European(excluding the English), or Asian, or American, and definitely from down under. Ban those bastards as well.

                    And finally anyone racist.
                    So I'll be fine then!
                    Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                    I preferred version 1!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
                      So I'll be fine then!
                      I thought you were a Rochdalian...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X