• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Salary Being Paid To HMRC - Who Then Pass On What You Are Due

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    A few years ago a spoof tax form appeared in a student rag week mag, with one box saying something like:

    How much do you earn? [ ]

    Send it
    and now it sounds like that will be in effect how it works!

    Why on Earth don't they just abolish PAYE entirely and increase tax on consumables, with a non-linear scale so poor people don't lose out disproportionately on necessities?

    In any case, in a few years they will be able to tax every money transfer when electronic money cards are the only means to make these.

    "Reforming" the PAYE system now would be like spending 100 billion converting the UK to driving on the right, when it will cost practically nothing in twenty or thirty years, or be totally unnecessary, because by then all vehicles on public highways will be robot-driven anyway. I bet the Lib Dems are behind this again, the imbeciles.
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
      A few years ago a spoof tax form appeared in a student rag week mag, with one box saying something like:



      and now it sounds like that will be in effect how it works!

      Why on Earth don't they just abolish PAYE entirely and increase tax on consumables, with a non-linear scale so poor people don't lose out disproportionately on necessities?

      In any case, in a few years they will be able to tax every money transfer when electronic money cards are the only means to make these.

      "Reforming" the PAYE system now would be like spending 100 billion converting the UK to driving on the right, when it will cost practically nothing in twenty or thirty years, or be totally unnecessary, because by then all vehicles on public highways will be robot-driven anyway. I bet the Lib Dems are behind this again, the imbeciles.
      Because poor people smoke fags, eat tulip food and drink beer, while rich people eat caviar, drink champagne and hang themselves in wardrobes while eating oranges!

      Oh I see what you've done there....
      What happens in General, stays in General.
      You know what they say about assumptions!

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
        A few years ago a spoof tax form appeared in a student rag week mag, with one box saying something like:



        and now it sounds like that will be in effect how it works!

        Why on Earth don't they just abolish PAYE entirely and increase tax on consumables, with a non-linear scale so poor people don't lose out disproportionately on necessities?

        In any case, in a few years they will be able to tax every money transfer when electronic money cards are the only means to make these.

        "Reforming" the PAYE system now would be like spending 100 billion converting the UK to driving on the right, when it will cost practically nothing in twenty or thirty years, or be totally unnecessary, because by then all vehicles on public highways will be robot-driven anyway. I bet HMRC CIVIL SERVANTS are behind this again, the imbeciles.


        fixed that for you

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Flashman View Post
          Thanks to the expenses scandal we all know how crooked our MP's are. So who is Nick Clegg the independently wealthy son of multi-millionaire non domiciled Bankster, to lecture anyone?

          One more public schoolboy on the Hate list for me.
          You're right, we'd be better being lectured by poorly educated, unintelligent working-class 'salt of the earth'. They'd know sod all about anything but at least they'd be easy to empathise with.

          I really don't see this argument. It's like saying you have to be a great footballer to be a great manager, or an ex-champion jockey to run a successful stable - rubbish.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #35
            You learn something new every day ...

            Earlier in this thread I refered that Income Tax was introduced to fund the Napoelonic Wars and that its time it was axed - what I didnt realise was that following the defeat of Napoleon ... income tax was repealed to "a thundering peal of applause" in Parliament.

            All documents connected with it were collected, cut into pieces and pulped.

            Good show.

            Income Tax dominated the 1874 election, with The Times proclaiming that "it is now evident that whoever is Chancellor... income tax will be abolished". Disraeli won, but tax stayed.







            The Napoleonic wars

            The first British income tax arrived in 1799 under William Pitt the Younger. A temporary means to stave off Napoleon, it was applied at a rate of 10 per cent on total income and paid in six equal installments. A year after Napoleon was defeated, income tax was repealed to "a thundering peal of applause" in Parliament. All documents connected with it were collected, cut into pieces and pulped.

            Peel, Gladstone and Disraeli

            Tax made a surprise return in 1842 under Conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel. Peel sought only to tax those with incomes above £150, and he reduced customs duties. The less wealthy benefited, and trade revived. The second half of the 19th century was dominated by Benjamin Disraeli and William Ewart Gladstone. Both campaigned for the abolition of income tax, but neither managed to achieve it. The issue dominated the 1874 election, with The Times proclaiming that "it is now evident that whoever is Chancellor... income tax will be abolished". Disraeli won, but tax stayed.

            A new way of thinking

            The Liberals won the 1905 election thanks to a pact with Labour, and a new way of thinking came about. Tax was seen as a way of supporting the people. In 1907, Chancellor Herbert Asquith introduced "differentiation," taxing less on earnings than on investments. Lloyd George, meanwhile, introduced non-contributory old-age pensions and, in the "People's Budget" of 1909, plans for a super-tax for the rich.

            First World War

            At the start of the war income tax sat at 6 per cent. By 1918, it had risen to 30 per cent. Meanwhile, an excess profits duty raised revenue and removed the excessive profits firms had made from the war effort. With this and other tax changes, the total collected rose to over £580m – 17 times the 1905 figure. Tax was very much a part of daily life.

            Second World War

            The outbreak of the Second World War prompted immediate revenue raising measures, with finance framed as "the fourth arm of defence." In 1939, the standard rate of income tax was 29 per cent. By 1944-45 it was 48 per cent for incomes over £20,000. An excess profits tax introduced for business raised further revenue, though was repealed in 1946.

            Post-war Pay-As-You-Earn

            The growing number of taxpayers during the war led to the more efficient Pay-As-You-Earn system from 1944. Tax began to be deducted by employers, and a worker leaving work was given a P45. The National Health Service was introduced in 1948, and, with the rise of the Welfare State, tax provisions changed. Corporation tax and capital gains tax were introduced, along with value added tax to replace purchase tax. In 1992, the Queen began to pay tax on her income.
            Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 23 September 2010, 07:53.

            Comment


              #36
              Lib Dems

              Are neither liberal or democratic.

              The are unhinged pathological communists. The sooner they are slapped down to obscurity again the better.

              That Cable is redder than a postbox
              There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                First World War

                At the start of the war income tax sat at 6 per cent. By 1918, it had risen to 30 per cent. Meanwhile, an excess profits duty raised revenue and removed the excessive profits firms had made from the war effort. With this and other tax changes, the total collected rose to over £580m – 17 times the 1905 figure. Tax was very much a part of daily life.
                We all lost WWI. The first Total War brought in more government, laws, control, and high taxes - everything from 30% tax and removal of the Bill of Rights' right to bear arms, to passport and ID controls and even pub closing time. Few of these temporary restrictions on our freedom have ever gone away.
                Job motivation: how the powerful steal from the stupid.

                Comment

                Working...
                X