back to the dark ages

[sasguru]

I don't know what happened, I wasn't there.

.

Didn't stop you posting complete drivel about it though.
Never mind it provided a good laugh, even if your rep for clear thinking was not enhanced one iota

[minestrone]

I don't know what happened, I wasn't there.

Feel free to embelish the above statement in any way you see fit.

You seem to be very sure that their account of the story is, in your words, "Bollocks".

That you are "not convinced"

So now you are saying that their account is accurate?

Are you stepping back from your claims of yesterday?

[minestrone]

I just managed to get a picture of the rabbit hole...



That is one massive rabbit...

[Churchill]

You seem to be very sure that their account of the story is, in your words, "Bollocks".

That you are "not convinced"

So now you are saying that their account is accurate?

Are you stepping back from your claims of yesterday?

What claims? That the fox attack wouldn't have happened if the door hadn't been left open? That in a related thread I mentioned that Rabbits have been known to shift soil and objects contained therein? That you're a liar, alcoholic and ill-educated fantasist?

Nope, I stand by all those claims.

[minestrone]

What claims? That the fox attack wouldn't have happened if the door hadn't been left open? That in a related thread I mentioned that Rabbits have been known to shift soil and objects contained therein? That you're a liar, alcoholic and ill-educated fantasist?

Nope, I stand by all those claims.

I think you will find your first comment was...

"I'd have thought that considering the age of the grave that it's more likely to be rabbits burrowing and throwing up debris."

Then went on to claim that it was unlikey to be foxes despite reading an article where the council said it was foxes. How thick are you?

[gricerboy]

Hello everybody

[Churchill]

I think you will find your first comment was...

"I'd have thought that considering the age of the grave that it's more likely to be rabbits burrowing and throwing up debris."

Then went on to claim that it was unlikey to be foxes despite reading an article where the council said it was foxes. How thick are you?

I also asked why a fox would be interested in the contents of a 150 year old grave.

[doodab]

I think you will find your first comment was...

"I'd have thought that considering the age of the grave that it's more likely to be rabbits burrowing and throwing up debris."

Then went on to claim that it was unlikey to be foxes despite reading an article where the council said it was foxes. How thick are you?

Well, in his defence, if you have ever dealt with a council official you would take the council's assertion that it was due to foxes with a large pinch of salt.

This website has lots of useful foxy information.

[minestrone]

I also asked why a fox would be interested in the contents of a 150 year old grave.

As I said at the time there would still be matter in and on those bones.

[MarillionFan]

I also asked why a fox would be interested in the contents of a 150 year old grave.

Perhaps it was trying to get at the bone eating bunny you saw!