• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

back to the dark ages

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    "Children mauled by fox"

    Churchill: "It was the parents fault and they probably did it themselves anyway"

    "Foxes dig up graves in our graveyard, we have an ongoing problem with foxes in that graveyard"

    Churchill: "It was a rabbit, a bone eating rabbit went down 6 foot, into the coffin and dug up a set of bones".

    It is like a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. You are like Vicky Pollard, meaningless pish just dribbles out your fat mouth.
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Am I?

    Where?
    See above.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Churchill View Post
      More dribble.
      Still waiting to hear your theory aabout why a fox didn't maul the infants.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        Still waiting to hear your theory aabout why a fox didn't maul the infants.
        You've missed his point then. It's back there on page 1.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          Originally posted by Churchill View Post
          As for you SB and Doohg, just think about what happened. A wild animal sneaked into the house, found the children, attacked and caused them serious damage without making a sound? Bollocks!!!

          If the door hadn't been open the animal wouldn't have got in, fact.

          I've just read the article. The mother appears to have confronted the fox in the kids bedroom. Sorry but I'm not convinced.
          I think this is the main point of spud brains argument in this post.

          Agrees there was a fox in room which he claims is a fact then says he is not convinced. Jesus, 1 O-level here can't even keep his story straight for one post.

          Comment


            I think Churchy is going for a killer rabbit being the culprit.
            FullyAutomatix and SB are going for flying killer carp.
            Personally I think the dad is Edwards Scissorhands, had an accident and the police haven't noticed yet because he didn't shake hands with them when they called.

            Its clearly not a fox.
            Last edited by sasguru; 9 June 2010, 10:20.
            Hard Brexit now!
            #prayfornodeal

            Comment


              Originally posted by Drewster View Post
              Do you always come this late???.... errr I mean do you often have fun after everyone else has finished? errr I mean.... errr hello MP
              Hi, Drewster. You don't half ramble, you.
              Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
              +5 Xeno Cool Points

              Comment


                Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                Hi, Drewster. You don't half ramble, you.
                Indeed no one could accuse Drewster of having a mind like a steel trap.

                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  I think Churcy has given up on this one.

                  I would like to know how he thinks it is a fact that a fox was in there but he is not convinced that a fox did the damage.

                  But if he can't explain his ramblings then...

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                    I think Churcy has given up on this one.

                    I would like to know how he thinks it is a fact that a fox was in there but he is not convinced that a fox did the damage.

                    But if he can't explain his ramblings then...
                    I don't know what happened, I wasn't there.

                    Feel free to embelish the above statement in any way you see fit.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                      Indeed no one could accuse Drewster of having a mind like a steel trap.
                      He is not alone on here
                      Fiscal nomad it's legal.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X