One of my friends is a nurse and is in charge of the other nurses on her ward. She told us about a nurse on her ward who had time off due to the stress of her cat snuffing it amongst other things. She plotted this nurses days off 'sick' and found it was planned to perfection - just enough days at the right times to stay the right side of the rules and maximise the sick days.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The etiquette of sacking an alcoholic.
Collapse
X
-
Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1! -
Is that the law or your personal (and therefore irrelevant) opinion? I don't know so it's a real question...Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThey should have sacked him the first time round.
Being an alcoholic or having a drug addiction is not a disabilityOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
They should have used the Bradford formula.Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostOne of my friends is a nurse and is in charge of the other nurses on her ward. She told us about a nurse on her ward who had time off due to the stress of her cat snuffing it amongst other things. She plotted this nurses days off 'sick' and found it was planned to perfection - just enough days at the right times to stay the right side of the rules and maximise the sick days.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
My brother consults to companies on their drink and drugs policy and was telling me that sacking someone for a drink problem is quite a difficult process and will probably lead to an unfair dismissal charge. It is basically treated as an illness and you have to offer to pay for treatment and time off and be preapared to do that again when they fall off the wagon.Comment
-
Illness, OK. Treatment, good. But why is it the employer who has to pay for it?Originally posted by minestrone View PostMy brother consults to companies on their drink and drugs policy and was telling me that sacking someone for a drink problem is quite a difficult process and will probably lead to an unfair dismissal charge. It is basically treated as an illness and you have to offer to pay for treatment and time off and be preapared to do that again when they fall off the wagon.Comment
-
Can you sack somebody for laziness or incompetence these days, or do they immediately claim it's an illness and therefore discrimination?Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
I used to get stressed about this sort of thing but now I think that it will generally work itself out over the long term. I have seen numerous examples of these types not being considered for any type of training, promotion, interesting work etc and always being the first on the list of people getting chopped, especially when I have been assembling the list (obviously this doesn't apply to the public sector). Some of them get into a frame of mind where they can't get back to any level of performance but like the people 'living it up on benefits', they will end up dragging along at the ass end of the economy where they belong.Comment
-
Because an employee has the same rights as anyone with a physical or mental condition.Originally posted by expat View PostIllness, OK. Treatment, good. But why is it the employer who has to pay for it?Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
They will usually claim that the job turned them to drink and that the employer has a duty to heal, in the same way if they done their back in on the job.Originally posted by expat View PostIllness, OK. Treatment, good. But why is it the employer who has to pay for it?Comment
-
Contractor I worked with got the boot for being drunk after an altercation with the front gate security bloke. Last I heard he was working for IBM.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Today 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Yesterday 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Comment