Originally posted by DiscoStu
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
FAQQER banned
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
I suppose it's like a Tardis perception filter.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Originally posted by tay View PostWell maybe you 2 could help raise the standard by making more pleasant posts?
Thanks, tay!
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by tay View PostWhy didnt you just threaten him with an infraction?
Why did he go straight to ban?
I thought it was fair comment since I had read somewhere that the context was what made the difference, and used a phrase that has been used 41 times on CUK in the past (including by other moderators), including
http://forums.contractoruk.com/1091292-post8.html
http://forums.contractoruk.com/1091304-post14.html
http://forums.contractoruk.com/1091310-post18.html
http://forums.contractoruk.com/1091623-post58.html
http://forums.contractoruk.com/1092696-post1.html
All fairly recent, so it's not as if it has suddenly become a banned phrase - or has it?
Originally posted by tay View PostI hope Faqqer comes back.
Otherwise it is just a victory for the the forces of darkness with their self proclaimed vision of getting anyone who disagrees with them banned.
Back, but not for long I suspect.Comment
-
To be fair to the moderation team, scotspine gave me an infraction. Just before a different moderator banned me.
Welcome back.
As I alluded to in another thread. I reported a post I thought contained abusive name calling, but it has been let go.
I am confused as to wether this means that word is allowed.. or just allowed by certain people. I guess the same query applies to your examples.Comment
-
Evening Faqqer. I can see the mods looking out of the jail now, pulling on their boots and thinking 'oh bollocks'.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Originally posted by tay View PostAs I alluded to in another thread. I reported a post I thought contained abusive name calling, but it has been let go.
Interesting.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostTo be fair to the moderation team, scotspine gave me an infraction. Just before a different moderator banned me.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment