Global Warming for Dummies

[sasguru]

blah blah guff guff blah blah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahbl ahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah tenuous link to warming as a result of the huge amounts of tediously irrelevant hot air you produce.

Ah the irony is exquisite.

[BlasterBates]

check the mauna loa CO2 levels that's how it is.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

[sasguru]

check the mauna loa CO2 levels that's how it is.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

Have you abandoned your previous argument now?
Yes CO2 levels are rising.

I think I get it BB. You're really a very subtle pro-AGW proponent who runs through the crap arguments produced by the anti-AGW faction to show how dumb they are. I can think of no other explanation for your posts.

[BlasterBates]

Have you abandoned your previous argument now?
Yes CO2 levels are rising.

rising not as fast as they were predicted to rise i.e. exponentially.

That is what Knorr said.

[sasguru]

rising not as fast as they were predicted to rise i.e. exponentially.

That is what Knorr said.

Who said they were meant to rise exponentially?

[BlasterBates]

Who said they were meant to rise exponentially?

Hansen

http://www.heatisonline.org/contents...21&method=full

He's wrong

that's the massive hole in the CO2 projections.

QED

[DiscoStu]

I think I'm going to invest in Global Warming, after all, it's made Al Gore richer than DimPrawn and sasguru put together.

[sasguru]

Hansen

http://www.heatisonline.org/contents...21&method=full

He's wrong

Is your argument that every scientist proponent of AGW must be right in every respect or the whole theory is wrong?

From the link I posted above:

"The latest study has been published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In 2006, global CO2 emissions were found to have risen to 9.9 billion metric tons, 35 percent above levels in 1990."


I would say a 35% increase in about 15 years is significant, no?

[sasguru]

QED

QED? Only a complete nincompoop would sign off with that.

[BlasterBates]

There's a prediction for exponential growth, linear growth and declining levels of CO2

http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/statements.htm