Global Warming for Dummies

[Drewster]

.... stuff .......

followed later by

QED? Only a complete nincompoop would sign off with that.

Does this prove the suggestion that you reply with what ever Tulip you have decided to spout before actually reading the post you are supposedly responding to?

Or is it just that you thought use of the word nincompoop deserved a post of its own?

[sasguru]

There's a prediction for exponential growth, linear growth and declining levels of CO2

http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/statements.htm

Isn't that website run by the discredited Beck, who we discussed earlier?
Goto 3.
This is getting tedious. You have no point and have to resort to discredited sources to make your non-point.

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008...ecks_dodgy.php

Epic Fail. Yet again.

[sasguru]

Or is it just that you thought use of the word nincompoop deserved a post of its own?

When applied to you it certain does. Nitwit.

[doodab]

The team's findings agree with the 2007 estimate from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which predicts that the preindustrial CO2 level of 280 parts per million (ppm) will climb to over 500 ppm by the year 2050 if we keep up our unregulated emissions.

At the current growth rate of approx 1.9 ppm (I've taken a 5 year moving average of the data BB linked to) we should have CO2 levels around 470ppm by 2050.

However, if you look at a moving average of the data it seems that the rate of increase is in fact increasing, from around 0.9 ppm per year in 1970 to around 1.9 ppm per year today. If that increase continues, we should be on course to reach or exceed the IPCC projection.

Of course, this is only one atmospheric CO2 measurement.

[Drewster]

When applied to you it certain does. Nitwit.

Nincompoop....
Nitwit.....

Are you looking these up?

[sasguru]

Nincompoop....
Nitwit.....

Are you looking these up?

No some of us are eduacted, you Nonentity.

[Drewster]

No some of us are eduacted, you Nonentity.

Keep going.......

[sasguru]

Keep going.......

Numbskull

[Drewster]

Numbskull

Pretty good....
Is Moron next or have you got a few more N's?

[sasguru]

Anyway I declare this thread closed.
I would like to thank Blaster Bates for his contribution to the pro AGW debate. After following his "arguments" it is clear that the anti_AGW brigade really don't have a leg to stand on. His subtle exposition of the flaws in the anti_AGW discourse has been masterly.

BB I salute you !

I refre the reader back to my first post on this thread which proven very apt.

Good bye.