• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Terrorists thankful for deflation

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Chico
    ...Since the only contribution you ever make is to resort to name calling...
    What do you expect Chico when you start off by calling those who do not take freedoms & legal protections for granted, 'liberal tree huggers' ?

    A hopelessly misplaced and inadequate label always likely to encourage vociferous responses.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by sasguru
      Keep at it Insight ...might take more time than you have though ...
      Christ.

      There's no reasoning with the criminally stupid. You were right.

      Comment


        #33
        Ah, but the real reason it cost loss

        for the UK bombers is because the Spanish bombers were not given a government grant for 'multicultural actions'.
        Why not?

        Comment


          #34
          insight - you are not very insightful are you? Lets break down your argument - article says London bombs were cheaper than the Spanish ones so what is your point? Do you have one?
          Sola gratia

          Sola fide

          Soli Deo gloria

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Chico
            insight - you are not very insightful are you? Lets break down your argument - article says London bombs were cheaper than the Spanish ones so what is your point? Do you have one?
            The bombers used different and cheaper materials you dimwit. The costs of producing 'a bomb' have not fallen as such.

            If your neighbour buys a Mercedes on monday for £60K and you buy a Ford Fiesta for £10K on Tuesday, your declaration that the price of cars had fallen would simply be idiotic. Is any of this getting through Chico?!

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Chico
              insight - you are not very insightful are you? Lets break down your argument - article says London bombs were cheaper than the Spanish ones so what is your point? Do you have one?
              Oh for the love of feck...

              Where does it say that the same chemicals were used in London as Madrid? Having some knowledge in the field, I can confidently state that if the Madrid bombings cost x10 more than the London bombings then the same materials were not used.

              Is there anything else you need clearing up?

              Comment


                #37
                This is fun. Bombs in Madrid cost £10,000 a few years ago. Last July it cost a few hundred pounds.So is the cost of making bombs constant going up, going down or constant? Will any articulate and coherent economists clarify for the assembled masses please.
                From the article "But the fact that London was bombed for such a cheap figure - and that the money was raised legitimately - highlights the problems that the authorities have in tackling terrorist financing.
                Sola gratia

                Sola fide

                Soli Deo gloria

                Comment


                  #38
                  The answer is still the same you bafoon:
                  ________________________________________

                  The bombers used different and cheaper materials you dimwit. The costs of producing 'a bomb' have not fallen as such.

                  If your neighbour buys a Mercedes on monday for £60K and you buy a Ford Fiesta for £10K on Tuesday, your declaration that the price of cars had fallen would simply be idiotic. Is any of this getting through Chico?!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Chico
                    This is fun. Bombs in Madrid cost £10,000 a few years ago. Last July it cost a few hundred pounds.So is the cost of making bombs constant going up, going down or constant? Will any articulate and coherent economists clarify for the assembled masses please.
                    From the article "But the fact that London was bombed for such a cheap figure - and that the money was raised legitimately - highlights the problems that the authorities have in tackling terrorist financing.
                    I don't really need to say anything. Carry on, Chico ...

                    Hard Brexit now!
                    #prayfornodeal

                    Comment


                      #40
                      The instructions
                      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X