• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Open Letter to Menelaus

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I dont want to see the guy banned, I dont want to see anyone banned, but the idea that he is now rendered harmless because he has done his porridge is a bit daft in my mind.
    This guy could lie for Britain
    So treat him with a bit of caution , but not kid gloves


    my 2c
    WHS.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by cojak View Post
      WHS.
      Agreed. Better the dev^H^H^H userid you know...

      Comment


        #63
        The only real solution (now we know it's a home for people with Mental Illness) is to be careful what information you divulge on CUK. Or at least treat everyone with some suspicion, I mean having to go into hiding is quite inconvienient now matter how liberal you are.

        As a side issue have wondered for some time if there is a sizable contingency logging in from institutions, it would explain a lot.
        Last edited by Bagpuss; 5 March 2010, 09:19.
        The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

        But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

        Comment


          #64
          WTS ^

          Hopefully any newbies will see this thread if they have the savvy to search for M, should they have cause to.

          I feel for Admin here - it's a tricky one.
          Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
          +5 Xeno Cool Points

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
            The only real solution (now we know it's a home for people with Mental Illness) is to be careful what information you divulge on CUK. Or at least treat everyone with some suspicion. Have wondered for some time if there is a sizable contingency logging in from institutions, it would explain a lot.
            errr isn't that the case anyway???? i.e that you should be careful what informatoin you divulge..

            or do you assume that you should divulge everything about yourself safe in the knowledge that this is a public forum that lurkers who don't even have to register can read and i'm sure if they wanted to gain various details about you to work out who you are.. if a person wanted to. I'm assuming you already know this however otherwise why didn't you add your full address in your profile and use your real name instead of Bagpuss..

            even if a user was banned there would be absolutely nothing stopping them reading this forum without ever logging in.. and even if that were possible by somehow blocking the ip address to the site, we all know that google takes a matter of seconds to trawl this site and include it in their search engine so how do you propose to stop that??
            The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
              IIRC, everyone who wanted to, got their money back from justgiving - it wasn't like the money went into his pocket.
              It wasn't a case of wanting our money back - beacuse we paid through Justgiving we knew it went to them/the charity and not him.

              Justgiving simply refunded us the money without explaination - if we'd not known what was going on from CUK, we wouldn't have been any the wiser TBH - RH can confirm this - he and I were in the same boat.

              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              I dont want to see the guy banned, I dont want to see anyone banned, but the idea that he is now rendered harmless because he has done his porridge is a bit daft in my mind.
              This guy could lie for Britain
              So treat him with a bit of caution , but not kid gloves


              my 2c
              Agreed!

              Originally posted by Churchill View Post
              On a more serious note if Menelaus had any shame or remorse he wouldn't post on here.

              It's not Admins responsibility.
              Couldn't agree more!!

              Admin have a tough enough time dealing with our playground antics.
              Bazza gets caught
              Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

              CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

              Comment


                #67
                We know we all have to be careful Chef.

                Maybe Menelaus would help us by giving an insight in how to spot and avoid the con. Like a burglar advising us on how to make our property more secure

                If he agrees I will reciprocate by advising the board on how to avoid a beer-belly



                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by chef View Post
                  errr isn't that the case anyway???? i.e that you should be careful what informatoin you divulge..

                  or do you assume that you should divulge everything about yourself safe in the knowledge that this is a public forum that lurkers who don't even have to register can read and i'm sure if they wanted to gain various details about you to work out who you are.. if a person wanted to. I'm assuming you already know this however otherwise why didn't you add your full address in your profile and use your real name instead of Bagpuss..

                  even if a user was banned there would be absolutely nothing stopping them reading this forum without ever logging in.. and even if that were possible by somehow blocking the ip address to the site, we all know that google takes a matter of seconds to trawl this site and include it in their search engine so how do you propose to stop that??
                  <cough>

                  "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                  - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by chef View Post
                    errr isn't that the case anyway???? i.e that you should be careful what informatoin you divulge..

                    or do you assume that you should divulge everything about yourself safe in the knowledge that this is a public forum that lurkers who don't even have to register can read and i'm sure if they wanted to gain various details about you to work out who you are.. if a person wanted to. I'm assuming you already know this however otherwise why didn't you add your full address in your profile and use your real name instead of Bagpuss..

                    even if a user was banned there would be absolutely nothing stopping them reading this forum without ever logging in.. and even if that were possible by somehow blocking the ip address to the site, we all know that google takes a matter of seconds to trawl this site and include it in their search engine so how do you propose to stop that??

                    It's all about trust, forget the banning issue. My feeling was this is a bulletin board for contractors to discuss issues, have a bit of a laugh, assume like minded people, or have some banter. It certainly used to be or what I took it to be, It's a shame the level of trust has gone and it's attracted/attracting more nefarious types. I expect you will tell me it's always been that way, but I don't think it has, so the question is..... Is this what you want?

                    Personally it's just another reason not to post very often. Yeah Yeah, I'll shut the door on my way out!
                    Last edited by Bagpuss; 5 March 2010, 09:32.
                    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                      but I don't think it has, so the question is..... Is this what we want?
                      It is the way of the world these days, whether you like it or not (see my previous post...)
                      "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                      - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X