- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Onanists
Collapse
X
-
Onanists
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.” -
-
The drug abusers part is almost certainly true, it is the only way most otherwise talentless young woman can earn enough to feed a drug habit, however, much of the association with crime is only because prostitution is illegal and therefore will tend to be run by criminals.Men who choose to use prostitutes are indirectly supporting drug dealers and abusers
Maybe a more sensible solution would be to legalise prostitution, subjecting it to the same rules as any other businesses to avoid nuisance (street traders can't set up on any street corner as they feel like it) and spend the money wasted on tackling it to pursuing the more serious crime of drug dealing.
PS Name and shame wouldn't work with us shameless dirty old men anywaybloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Originally posted by darmstadt£50 for three months' rent, and free meals and a gym?! What's to stop anyone saying they're a prostitute and staying there for three months? Jeez, if I had a contract in the same town I'd be tempted to do the same!Prostitutes wanting to use the facility also have to pay £50 to "rent" a room there for three months. For that price they get free meals and access to the Artemis gym.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
The snag is, as we find so often with Labour, the more a government tries to manipulate and interfere in peoples' personal lives the more they have to. It's like pulling the wool out of a jumper.Originally posted by xoggothMaybe a more sensible solution would be to legalise prostitution, subjecting it to the same rules as any other businesses to avoid nuisance
If prostitution were legalized then, knowing how thick and incompetent NL are, and meddlesome, before long they'd somehow find themselves actively encouraging young people to do it.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
And another dumbed-down GCSE to go alongside Media Studies, Social Studies and Flower Arranging.Originally posted by OwlHootIf prostitution were legalized then, knowing how thick and incompetent NL are, and meddlesome, before long they'd somehow find themselves actively encouraging young people to do it.Comment
-
hmnnn
"The drug abusers part is almost certainly true, it is the only way most otherwise talentless young woman can earn enough to feed a drug habit,"
Yes, I suppose there can only be so many models.Why not?Comment
-
They wouldn't have to do anything - the mechanisms are already in place - remember what happened in Germany - I'm fairly sure someone posted a link to an article about it on this site. In Germany they decided to legalise prostitution, this meant brothel-owners could advertise at the job-centre equivalent, just like any other business, and a woman with no desire to work in the profession was sent for an inteview. If this happened in the UK then I think under current rules she could have her benefit stopped if she refused to many job offers.If prostitution were legalized then, knowing how thick and incompetent NL are, and meddlesome, before long they'd somehow find themselves actively encouraging young people to do it.
In principal I'm in favour of legal prostitution, so the above presents a bit of a dilemma - not sure what I would want to do about it, if I were a politician. Probably abolishing benefits for unemployment altogether would be the answer. (Replace the income with the universal tax credit from my proposed tax system.)Comment
-
Interesting argument on Hecklers this evening (Radio 4), proposing the idea that the introduction of the welfare state has been a huge mistake and that the country would be better off today if it had not been introduced.
Listen again here: HecklersComment
-
The country might well be better off indeed, although some (many?) individuals would not necessarily b e so. and since the country doesn't get a vote........Originally posted by Lucifer BoxInteresting argument on Hecklers this evening (Radio 4), proposing the idea that the introduction of the welfare state has been a huge mistake and that the country would be better off today if it had not been introduced.
Listen again here: HecklersWhy not?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Comment