• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Troll's 3 point plan to save Britain

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Count me out then.
    Great, me too. British Military hospital, Deutschland.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
      Americans aren't strictly 1st world. Most of them exist on food vouchers
      NOT most. Voucher system is better than cash handouts because those who need food should not be getting cash to spend it on Sky TV and stuff like that.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        Outside of the City and its salaries there's precious little to attract anyone here: not the weather,not the rail service, road system, NHS, size of houses or economy. And its not going to get better, the cake is too small to support a population of £65 million +
        The cake is too small to support you alone!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          NOT most. Voucher system is better than cash handouts because those who need food should not be getting cash to spend it on Sky TV and stuff like that.
          Okay, I exaggerate, but it's a huge number.

          I had a brief go at Googling it, but only got 6 million that exist solely of food stamps
          Desperate times in America: selling food stamps to pay for bills

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            NOT most. Voucher system is better than cash handouts because those who need food should not be getting cash to spend it on Sky TV and stuff like that.
            That old simplistic solution again. I thought better of you AtW. I didn't think that you were that silly.

            Vouchers do not work as there would be a secondary market to convert them into cash at a lower yield.

            It also makes the recipient more dependant on the state and less able to make decisions for themselves.

            They are totally counter productive.
            How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

            Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
            Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

            "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
              Okay, I exaggerate, but it's a huge number.

              I had a brief go at Googling it, but only got 6 million that exist solely of food stamps
              Desperate times in America: selling food stamps to pay for bills
              6 mln out of 300 mln population, or 2%.

              How many people in the UK (out of 61 mln) exist solely on benefits?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
                Vouchers do not work as there would be a secondary market to convert them into cash at a lower yield.
                Conversion of cash happens at higher yield - 100% of it.
                Last edited by AtW; 24 February 2010, 10:53.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Conversion of cash happens at higher yield - 100% of it.
                  Not if I was converting
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Troll View Post
                    1: Only people born here are entitled to vote

                    2: Career politicians are to be executed at dawn, only those successful in business and having raised a family can be appointed to Cabinet positions (might make an exception for Defence)

                    3: Points based migration to be available only from 1st world nations
                    Hmmm.

                    1. Only people who are tax resident in the UK and are part of a family whose main breadwinner would normally pay UK income tax can vote. For this purpose anyone over the age of 21 is counted as an individual reagrdless of family situation.

                    2. Only those with direct experience of a particular field should be appointed to government positions within that field ( Teachers in Education department, Doctors in Health etc. ).

                    3. Companies may only transfer foreign nationals into UK based posts if the individuals concerned would pass standard immigration requirements were they not employed by that company.
                    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Vouchers do work better when paying for goods and services needing credit. Currently with things like rent & childcare the money is paid to the claimant who then fails to pass it on to landlord / childcare provider causing them to refuse DHSS clients in future.

                      Food I'm not so sure but it saves them spending it on fags & booze without conversion.

                      Anyone watched 'Tower block of commons' definitely worth looking out for. If purely for the moment when the Labour politician (Austen Mitchell) refused to live with any of the riff raff and demanded his own council property. He then preceded to pop round his friends for a dinner party. He couldn't have appeared more champagne socialist if he tried.

                      Mitchell talked a lot but didn't really achieve anything.

                      Though Mark Oaten being placed with a gay couple was a bit predictable, he should have seen that coming.

                      The tories & lib dems seemed to do the best actually changing something. Oaten managed to raise the profile of the redevelopment needed in the area, Nadine Dorries made some inroads into the local mosque managing to get the residents & worshippers talking and Tim Loughton got the local boys playing football.


                      Now before hitting the hustings if candidates could be tasked with this kind of experience and show how much change they had made it would really restore faith in our politicians.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X