Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Here we go, it's no good leaving the UK...
Collapse
X
-
No, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
not if you're tax resident elsewhere and meet the countries laws on the amount of time you spend there, no.Originally posted by AtW View PostSo you own shops and factories in this country, go there frequently to supervise and expect to pay no tax on this activity?
exactlyOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek PointsComment
-
Precisely. I own shares in LTDs in Britain, Netherlands and Turkey. I pay corporation tax in Britain on the British company, Netherlands on the Dutch company and Turkey on the Turkish company. I pay income tax in Holland because that's where I recieve my income. I don’t expect to have to pay personal taxation in two other countries simply because I have invested in business ventures in those countries, even if in one year I might make a lot of visits for the sake of doing business, because my house and the place where I’m registered at the council is in Holland.Originally posted by chef View Postnot if you're tax resident elsewhere and meet the countries laws on the amount of time you spend there, no.
exactlyAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Agreed. I think the whole thing is a bit harsh, he met the residency rules as far as they were written, and ATW is talking out of his rear...Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostPrecisely. I own shares in LTDs in Britain, Netherlands and Turkey. I pay corporation tax in Britain on the British company, Netherlands on the Dutch company and Turkey on the Turkish company. I pay income tax in Holland because that's where I recieve my income. I don’t expect to have to pay personal taxation in two other countries simply because I have invested in business ventures in those countries, even if in one year I might make a lot of visits for the sake of doing business, because my house and the place where I’m registered at the council is in Holland.Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
nothing new there thenOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View Postand ATW is talking out of his rear...
The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek PointsComment
-
Comment
-
-
AFAIK Green's wife owns shares and she's got dividends.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.Comment
-
AtW is telling you clearly the real story but nobody is listening. The rules are clear: The 91-day/183-day rules are not the only rules here.
In general the rules for days in the UK specify that IF you exceed those limits then you WILL be resident or normally resident. Nowhere is it said that if you do NOT exceed those limits then you will not be resident.
There is no single precise definition of not being resident, normally resident, and/or domiciled in the UK. In general you would have to satisfy HMRC that you have actually left the UK permanently and not maintained a connection. So things like still having UK bank accounts, mobile phones, and certainly property, would be likely to make them think that you have not cut all ties with the UK.Step outside posh boyComment
-
In other words the law is set up such that the individual has no means to assure himself of the legality of his actions but HMRC can decide retrospectively that his actions did not comply with the law?Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View PostAtW is telling you clearly the real story but nobody is listening. The rules are clear: The 91-day/183-day rules are not the only rules here.
In general the rules for days in the UK specify that IF you exceed those limits then you WILL be resident or normally resident. Nowhere is it said that if you do NOT exceed those limits then you will not be resident.
There is no single precise definition of not being resident, normally resident, and/or domiciled in the UK. In general you would have to satisfy HMRC that you have actually left the UK permanently and not maintained a connection. So things like still having UK bank accounts, mobile phones, and certainly property, would be likely to make them think that you have not cut all ties with the UK.
Sounds like a f**king banana republic to me.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment