• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Here we go, it's no good leaving the UK...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    So you own shops and factories in this country, go there frequently to supervise and expect to pay no tax on this activity?
    No, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      So you own shops and factories in this country, go there frequently to supervise and expect to pay no tax on this activity?
      not if you're tax resident elsewhere and meet the countries laws on the amount of time you spend there, no.

      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      No, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.
      exactly
      The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by chef View Post
        not if you're tax resident elsewhere and meet the countries laws on the amount of time you spend there, no.



        exactly
        Precisely. I own shares in LTDs in Britain, Netherlands and Turkey. I pay corporation tax in Britain on the British company, Netherlands on the Dutch company and Turkey on the Turkish company. I pay income tax in Holland because that's where I recieve my income. I don’t expect to have to pay personal taxation in two other countries simply because I have invested in business ventures in those countries, even if in one year I might make a lot of visits for the sake of doing business, because my house and the place where I’m registered at the council is in Holland.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Precisely. I own shares in LTDs in Britain, Netherlands and Turkey. I pay corporation tax in Britain on the British company, Netherlands on the Dutch company and Turkey on the Turkish company. I pay income tax in Holland because that's where I recieve my income. I don’t expect to have to pay personal taxation in two other countries simply because I have invested in business ventures in those countries, even if in one year I might make a lot of visits for the sake of doing business, because my house and the place where I’m registered at the council is in Holland.
          Agreed. I think the whole thing is a bit harsh, he met the residency rules as far as they were written, and ATW is talking out of his rear...
          Older and ...well, just older!!

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            and ATW is talking out of his rear...
            nothing new there then
            The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by chef View Post
              nothing new there then
              Nope...
              ǝןqqıʍ

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                Nope...

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  No, the business would pay tax, but the individual would not. A bit like Philip Green.
                  AFAIK Green's wife owns shares and she's got dividends.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    AtW is telling you clearly the real story but nobody is listening. The rules are clear: The 91-day/183-day rules are not the only rules here.

                    In general the rules for days in the UK specify that IF you exceed those limits then you WILL be resident or normally resident. Nowhere is it said that if you do NOT exceed those limits then you will not be resident.

                    There is no single precise definition of not being resident, normally resident, and/or domiciled in the UK. In general you would have to satisfy HMRC that you have actually left the UK permanently and not maintained a connection. So things like still having UK bank accounts, mobile phones, and certainly property, would be likely to make them think that you have not cut all ties with the UK.
                    Step outside posh boy

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
                      AtW is telling you clearly the real story but nobody is listening. The rules are clear: The 91-day/183-day rules are not the only rules here.

                      In general the rules for days in the UK specify that IF you exceed those limits then you WILL be resident or normally resident. Nowhere is it said that if you do NOT exceed those limits then you will not be resident.

                      There is no single precise definition of not being resident, normally resident, and/or domiciled in the UK. In general you would have to satisfy HMRC that you have actually left the UK permanently and not maintained a connection. So things like still having UK bank accounts, mobile phones, and certainly property, would be likely to make them think that you have not cut all ties with the UK.
                      In other words the law is set up such that the individual has no means to assure himself of the legality of his actions but HMRC can decide retrospectively that his actions did not comply with the law?

                      Sounds like a f**king banana republic to me.
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X