I still can't work out why The Times presents this as a "bombshell". All sane people know that whoever wins the election is going to raise taxes.
More to the point: when VAT was reduced by 2.5%, everybody was rushing to say that it was a meaningless gesture, as it had such a trivial effect on the cost of things. (I remember the thread here, and will dig it up if necessary.)
Given that so many regarded the effect of the 2.5% reduction in VAT as laughable, in that it only amounted to a couple of pence here and there in their day-to-day expenditure, I presume those same people will be rushing to claim that a 2.5% increase will have a similarly negligible effect on their lives, being once again a matter of a couple of pence here and there.
More to the point: when VAT was reduced by 2.5%, everybody was rushing to say that it was a meaningless gesture, as it had such a trivial effect on the cost of things. (I remember the thread here, and will dig it up if necessary.)
Given that so many regarded the effect of the 2.5% reduction in VAT as laughable, in that it only amounted to a couple of pence here and there in their day-to-day expenditure, I presume those same people will be rushing to claim that a 2.5% increase will have a similarly negligible effect on their lives, being once again a matter of a couple of pence here and there.
Comment