• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What is a good 'symbol' for an atheist to wear?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Any sign of my symbol yet?

    Comment


      Originally posted by singhr View Post
      Any sign of my symbol yet?
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by singhr View Post
        Any sign of my symbol yet?
        Use this one, I don't think prince is using it any more.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          try this one




          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
            ...
            Interesting note: out of 70,000 skeletons recently examined from the time/place of Jesus, only one was found to have evidence of being nailed to anything. Most sinners were just tied to a cross, nails being too expensive to throw away on mere Christian crusifictions it seems. Hey but wait a minute, I wonder if that one could of been...no it couldn't be...could it??
            No it couldn't. At least, in the Christian and Muslim view. Christians believe (for the main part) that he was raised from the dead. Muslims believe he was spirited from the cross before he died. The paucity of nails in crucifixion victims has been known for years. It seems that in the cases where it has been found (with nails through ankles and wrists), that it could have been done as an additional discomfort. Maybe the 70'000 recently examined that you talk about were the victims of the sacking of Jerusalem. That would explain their not being enough nails.

            Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
            I'd like to know what was before the universe before the big bang.
            Augustine nailed this one (the Christian version is "what was before God made the universe" or "what was before God"). The answer is the same. Time came into existence at the point of the big bang/let there be light. To talk about a time "before" time began is a logical absurdity, with no meaning.

            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            No, really, an infinite number of Sasgurus will write something useful. By definition, an infinite number of other Sasgurus will write nothing of any use whatsoever, given an infinite number of universes.
            Not true. There could be an infinite number of Sasgurus and no useful writing produced. If being Sasguru and writing something useful are inherently contradictory, then it won't happen. Consider, there are an infinite number of even numbers. Not one of them is odd.
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
              Not true. There could be an infinite number of Sasgurus and no useful writing produced. If being Sasguru and writing something useful are inherently contradictory, then it won't happen. Consider, there are an infinite number of even numbers. Not one of them is odd.
              Ah, but now you posit that there is a fundamental law precluding useful writings by Sasguru. Are the fundamental laws of physics identical in all universes? Surely that's unlikely. Given an infinite number of universes there may be many, or even infinite varieties of fundamental laws, thereby allowing for the possibility that a Sasguru in a hitherto unknown universe may at this very moment be writing something useful. If that possibility is present, then given infinite universes it will surely happen in some of those universes. Of course, it's quite possible that no Sasguru is currently writing anything useful in any universe, if the infinite universes are not concurrent. Given concurrent infinite universes, some Sasgurus are writing something useful.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                The logical problem with this is that SasGurus rantings on here ARE approaching infinity. or maybe it just seems that way





                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  Originally posted by LostInBrussels View Post
                  But, unless Athiests can prove there is NO God, they are in no position to criticise.
                  Completely wrong on that point.

                  Anybody who makes "extraordinary claims" must be able to back up those claims with "extraordinary proof".

                  It's not for the doubters to prove, it's for the claimants to prove.

                  If I told you I could "fly" by flapping my hands, it's perfectly understandable for you to not believe me. I have to prove to you my claim. Evidence-led factual analysis.
                  Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

                  C.S. Lewis

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X