Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anti wrong war I may be. They took their eye off the ball, let the terrorists escape and re-group while they created a few more in Iraq. That is the policy of an idiot.
shaunbhoy: Have you ever considered that they did it this way, knowing that they would create lots of terrorists.
One has to remember a beaurocracy such as a civil service has long term aims. If one of their aims was the introduction of ID cards what better way than to go and generate "reasons" for them?
shaunbhoy: Have you ever considered that they did it this way, knowing that they would create lots of terrorists.
One has to remember a beaurocracy such as a civil service has long term aims. If one of their aims was the introduction of ID cards what better way than to go and generate "reasons" for them?
And that is not realy threaded is it.
If you had said "the other morning a stunning senior civil servant told me that they invaded Iraq to create an atmosphere conducive to ID cards whilst cooking me breakfast after a very athletic night between the sheets just before I drove her home in my Lambo" I might have believed you.
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time
shaunbhoy: Have you ever considered that they did it this way, knowing that they would create lots of terrorists.
One has to remember a beaurocracy such as a civil service has long term aims. If one of their aims was the introduction of ID cards what better way than to go and generate "reasons" for them?
No I don't think that, but it's fortunate and top reason will now become terror again as oppposed to last weeks reason.. ID fraud
Why are they not detonating at Jewish targets all over the world? for Palastine.
They have plenty of targets near Palestine. Slowly they took notice of the USA taking side of Israel, and responded to it in their own way. UK never was pro-Israeli, which is why it was in relative peace. Now UK took side with USA in Iraq, and today's event is the result of that.
I can't see how war in Iraq was worth it -- even bloody fuel is at all times high.
Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
This is posturing against the West using excuses. Once the excuses are removed there will be another reason to carry on.
This is a matter of cause and effect. Cause (Iraq) resulted in effect -- today's bombing of London.
And now UK's is faced with having to carry on war in Iraq because to do otherwise would be seen as "giving to terrorists", how bloody convinient to both red-necks who make money on war, and said terrorists who need easy target to bomb.
All would have been well if it was not for innocent people killed in cross-fire.
I think Muslims the world over need to stand up and take responsibility for the mess their religion has become.
And what exactly should they do? Renounce Allah? Perhaps state that there are no 79 or so virgins in heaven, and there is no heaven in the first place?
Atw I am referring to the fact that the majority of terror attacks are carried out by radical islamic extreemists. Why is this not true with other religions?
Comment