• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Climate change: the true price of the warmists' folly is becoming clear

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    [QUOTE=DodgyAgent;1042564]
    Originally posted by Diver View Post

    I think your level of contact may be at PR(opoganda) and marketing level

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/ear...-question.html
    Telegraph.co.uk -Sunday 10 January 2010

    Super wind farms to be £100bn prize for utilities

    The awards are due to be made official by the Crown Estate by the end of next month, with the first turbines entering the water by 2014 Photo: Reuters

    The Prime Minister is due to announce on Friday which power companies have won the right to build the massive wind farms, mostly in the North Sea.
    The report is dated Sunday 10 January 2010

    Telegraph = The awards are due to be made official by the Crown Estate by the end of next month !!!!!!!
    They were made official last month

    Telegraph = The Prime Minister is due to announce on Friday
    Already announced 2 days ago

    and these incompetents are the source you are quoting to us?
    Confusion is a natural state of being

    Comment


      #72
      It seems most people are talking about the problem being no wind, but what about too much wind? If it starts gusting too hard wind turbines shut down to prevent damage, the damping motors to shut it down things can all go a bit pete tong.....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u14tBwO5QVQ

      The question is how often will wind speed be both fast enough to power it, and slow enough to not destroy it?

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
        The question is how often will wind speed be both fast enough to power it, and slow enough to not destroy it?
        Look, it works fine in Denmark and many other places. Investment in the field is increasing and this helps solve some of the problems earlier models had.

        Apart from Solar energy pretty much all other solutions involve some kind of dependency on a fuel that will need to be bought from countries with backwards regimes.

        The whole game is NOT about getting 100% of energy from these new sources - just reduce usage of oil enough (25-30%) so that the price would collapse back to where it was: $20 per barrel. Considering how much highly priced oil costs the economy all the money put into renewables are well worth it.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          But nuclear power stations would be developed by the French : so not much better there.

          I can understand why our young children dont want to enter marine engineering though. The prospect of working with Diver must put off alot of youngsters.....

          1. We do have a shortage of trained engineers and other professionals, particularly in Marine Civil Engineering and Electrical.

            Training facilities are being sourced and set up to meet the demand

          2. We do have a lack of Port facilities capable (at present) of supporting offshore development

            This is not a major problem, I have visited and assessed most of the ports around the UK over the past year and held consultations with all the port operators. development of the selected ports to support offshore development is not even a minor issue, and can be carried out quickly and economically

          3. We do (at present) have a lack of manufacturing facilities capable of producing components for the offshore energy converters

            We do have a vast manufacturing and fabrication base within the UK capable of being quickly developed to meet the necessary requirements for offshore supply, I have been meeting and consulting with several manufactures and fabricators for the past few months, and there is a development strategy in place that will ensure that the UK plays a significant part in offshore development

          4. We do have transport issues

            As with any project of such magnitude, with component transport running into millions of tonnes, Much of it as abnormal loads, there are going to be transport issues. This has been assessed over the past year and I am confident after consultation with transport companies both marine rail and road, that I have outlined a transport strategy that will meet the needs of the industry

          5. We do have a lack of construction vessels capable of supporting construction further offshore


          Several new purpose designed jackup barges, heavy lift vessels and DP vessels have already been commissioned and are under construction ready to meet the demand. several were completed late last year and are awaiting deployment.


          Any more questions
          Confusion is a natural state of being

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by Diver View Post
            Any more questions
            Yes.

            May I have a job, please?
            My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Diver View Post
              Any more questions
              Yes, how many share do you own in it?

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
                Yes.

                May I have a job, please?
                Yes if you have the engineering or marine qualifications or skills required

                Seriously
                Confusion is a natural state of being

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Yes, how many share do you own in it?
                  Absolutely none

                  Seriously
                  Confusion is a natural state of being

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                    Aren't these wind energy projects heavily subsidised? In effect UK tax payers will be subsidising foreign firms?
                    Most of the subsidies are through EU grants, therefore foreign taxpayers will be subsidising us

                    The money is coming via the European Energy Programme for Recovery (EEPR) fund, which has earmarked total grants €1 billion (£0.9 billion) to six CCS projects and €510 million (£461 million) to nine offshore wind energy projects in Europe.

                    As already reported by GreenWise in October, £164 million of the funding is to go to Powerfuel Ltd ito develop a new 900 megawatt (MW) CCS power plant at Hatfield, Yorkshire.

                    Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, a division of Scottish and Southern Energy, will receive £67 million to build an intermediary platform on its planned high-voltage direct current link between Shetland and Scottish mainland to connect offshore wind and marine generation.

                    Meanwhile, Aberdeen Offshore Wind Farm Ltd, will receive £36 million to develop a wind deployment facility for the testing of multi MW turbines and to optimise the manufacturing capacities of offshore wind energy production equipment.




                    HTH
                    Last edited by Diver; 10 January 2010, 21:18.
                    Confusion is a natural state of being

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by centurian View Post
                      The reason why the Hoover dam is so strong is that they didn't understand how forces worked and had no means of modelling it. So they way overspecced it and added in a truckload of fudge factors. The result is that the dam itself is stronger than the valley it sits in - and the concrete is still curing to this day, making it even stronger day-by-day.

                      Now we build them exactly as strong as they need to be - at least that's the theory anyway.
                      At the time the Hoover Dam was built a recent catastrophe would have been fresh in people's minds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Francis_Dam.

                      The St Francis Dam disaster was the end of William Mulholland's career and it is only more recent geological science developments that have exonerated him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X