- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I'll bet they were glad to have a firearm at home to defend themselves
Collapse
X
-
-
No, they most likely would not - it's not position from which one can defend effectively.
I note here that current firearms ban did not prevent this tradegy. In fact if they were completely banned that people in such positions would use even more horrible weapons - axes for example or hammers.
Tomorrow around 8 people will die. Probably more due to weather - 8 is average road deaths each year, with a lot more wounded. That's 7/7 every week.
Maybe cars should be banned to. -
Comment
-
Agreed. This isn't a unique story. There are enough of these a year where people are stabbed, drowned or beaten to death in the same situation. The fact a gun is used is of little consequence. Interestingly it doesn't mention if it was a licensed firearm or not. Thing that pisses me off is that everytime there is a gun related incident there are calls for licenses etc but 9 times out of 10 an illegal weapon was used so regulation would make no difference.Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, they most likely would not - it's not position from which one can defend effectively.
I note here that current firearms ban did not prevent this tradegy. In fact if they were completely banned that people in such positions would use even more horrible weapons - axes for example or hammers.
Tomorrow around 8 people will die. Probably more due to weather - 8 is average road deaths each year, with a lot more wounded. That's 7/7 every week.
Maybe cars should be banned to.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
As a matter of interest, do you think that there would be more, the same, or fewer murders if we relaxed our gun laws (genuine question, I'm not trying to pick a fight)?Originally posted by AtW View PostNo, they most likely would not - it's not position from which one can defend effectively.
I note here that current firearms ban did not prevent this tradegy. In fact if they were completely banned that people in such positions would use even more horrible weapons - axes for example or hammers.
Tomorrow around 8 people will die. Probably more due to weather - 8 is average road deaths each year, with a lot more wounded. That's 7/7 every week.
Maybe cars should be banned to.Comment
-
I think there will be more involving guns which will bring the situation to the headlines with tabloids and government bashers having a field day, forgetting to mention whether or not the actual total of murders go up or not.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostAs a matter of interest, do you think that there would be more, the same, or fewer murders if we relaxed our gun laws (genuine question, I'm not trying to pick a fight)?
I think the gun may become the weapon of choice but don't think the rate will go up significantly.
Armed robberies however is a different matter altogether. IMO that will go thru the roof.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
"the shooting had taken place as the woman dropped the four-year-old off at her former family home."
Sounds very very odd to me. Her solicitor must be terrible.Comment
-
According to the article they only split up 4 weeks ago - not enough time for the parasites to get involved. Most of 'em couldn't answer a letter or return a phone call in 4 weeks.Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post"the shooting had taken place as the woman dropped the four-year-old off at her former family home."
Sounds very very odd to me. Her solicitor must be terrible.Comment
-
Very true they are parasites. But usually they get involved before 1 party moves out. And its usually the man who moves out(usually rightly). But the person who moves out is in a very weak position.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostAccording to the article they only split up 4 weeks ago - not enough time for the parasites to get involved. Most of 'em couldn't answer a letter or return a phone call in 4 weeks.
I suspect what happened here was the man was a bully who forced her out. She then took legal advice and told him where he stood. He then did what so many men do and make a terrible decision.
Its a tragedy.Comment
-
Mr Copland has at least one grown-up daughter from a previous relationship. A family friend described him as a "very volatile man".Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostVery true they are parasites. But usually they get involved before 1 party moves out. And its usually the man who moves out(usually rightly). But the person who moves out is in a very weak position.
I suspect what happened here was the man was a bully who forced her out. She then took legal advice and told him where he stood. He then did what so many men do and make a terrible decision.
Its a tragedy.Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment