• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Global Warming

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Oh and Blaster, do stop trolling. Its obvious what you're up to
    Hard Brexit now!
    #prayfornodeal

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
      This Dr. Lindzen?

      http://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2007...rming-skeptic/

      "In 2005, James Annan offered to take Lindzen, the MIT meteorologist, up on his bet that global temperatures in 20 years will be cooler than they are now. However, no wager was ever settled on because Lindzen wanted odds of 50-to-1 in his favour. This meant that for a $10,000 bet, Annan would have to pay Lindzen the entire sum if temperatures dropped, but receive only $200 if they rose.

      “Richard Lindzen’s words say that there is about a 50 percent chance of [global] cooling,” Annan wrote about the bet. “His wallet thinks it is a 2 percent shot. Which do you believe?”
      "

      Really I do know you're not very well educated but to fall for such simple propaganda? Sheesh.
      Your source is "Doug's Darkworld".....

      Is "Doug's Darkworld" a refereed journal?

      Just for the record I've been citing Professor Lindzen and Professor Easterbrook.
      Sasguru cites "Doug" whoever he is.
      Last edited by BlasterBates; 19 January 2010, 17:28.
      I'm alright Jack

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
        Your source is "Doug's Darkworld".....

        Is "Doug's Darkworld" a refereed journal?

        Just for the record I've been citing Professor Lindzen and Professor Easterbrook.
        Sasguru cites "Doug" whoever he is.
        it's another pointless climate change blog, one of millions which could have been used to prove the arguement either way.

        Using links to blogs to prove an arguement is getting tiresome
        Coffee's for closers

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
          Using links to blogs to prove an argument is getting tiresome
          That depends upon the quality of the blog, Shirley?
          My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            This Dr. Lindzen?

            http://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2007...rming-skeptic/

            "In 2005, James Annan offered to take Lindzen, the MIT meteorologist, up on his bet that global temperatures in 20 years will be cooler than they are now. However, no wager was ever settled on because Lindzen wanted odds of 50-to-1 in his favour. This meant that for a $10,000 bet, Annan would have to pay Lindzen the entire sum if temperatures dropped, but receive only $200 if they rose.

            “Richard Lindzen’s words say that there is about a 50 percent chance of [global] cooling,” Annan wrote about the bet. “His wallet thinks it is a 2 percent shot. Which do you believe?”
            "

            Really I do know you're not very well educated but to fall for such simple propaganda? Sheesh.
            Does a report of someone not taking a bet negate evidence against global warming?

            Only asking, like.

            Comment


              #96
              Why do we poo-poo economists, yet set stall by climatologists?

              They both work in a similar way. Except that economists have more historical data.

              Comment


                #97
                Oh, do stop with this, it's about as interesting as AtWs lunch. The global warming crowd have been shown to be a bunch of charlatans peddling bogus science from fiddled data. It's just a new wheeze for TPTB to raise taxes, that's all.
                Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                  I dont vote Tory
                  You should.

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Can you imagine the uproar from climate zealots if the recent weather had been abnormally warm instead fo abnormally cold?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by David Cameron View Post
                      Can you imagine the uproar from climate zealots if the recent weather had been abnormally warm instead fo abnormally cold?
                      define abnormal in this country

                      the weather always does whatever it ******* feels like doing!
                      Coffee's for closers

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X