- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
UberBoomed
Collapse
X
-
-
If a government project goes pear shaped, don't then insist that everyone you hire has been on the same project before; repeating the same actions time and time again and expecting a different result is stupidity.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Thats your mistake.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostIf a government project goes pear shaped, don't then insist that everyone you hire has been on the same project before; repeating the same actions time and time again and expecting a different result is stupidity.
The people already involved will learn from their mistakes and not make the same ones again. SimplesCoffee's for closersComment
-
I doubt the laundering of £100 billion was a mistake.
Nice to see the Conservatives trying though. Or is it? Who is "Alan Mabbutt on behalf of the Conservative Party, both at 30 Millbank, London, SW1P 4DP"?Comment
-
WHS++Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI doubt the laundering of £100 billion was a mistake.
Nice to see the Conservatives trying though. Or is it? Who is "Alan Mabbutt on behalf of the Conservative Party, both at 30 Millbank, London, SW1P 4DP"?
I have software going in to Gov IT projects in several countries. UK Gov wouldn't even listen to MyCo, even though we have as references several award winning Danish Gov sites, which are generally accepted to be the absolute best in the world, by quite a long way.
So one of the usual suspects is taking a cut, and for no added value.
So what the poster says, once you have discounted all other reasons, is the one that remains...Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Maybe not immediately, but the same people aren't involved for long and the Poincaré Recurrence Time is only a few years.Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
The people already involved will learn from their mistakes and not make the same ones again. Simples
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Today 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02
- Budget 2026: what UK housing needs (and doesn’t) Sep 7 06:52

Comment