Originally posted by Jeebo72
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Banks Win...:(
Collapse
X
-
The point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
They make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?The result is that banks can continue charging high fees for customers who go overdrawn without authority to subsidise the cost of providing current accounts to other customers who stay in the black.Comment
-
It costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.
Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
I did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.Originally posted by Scary View PostThey make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?
It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
I'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostI did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.
It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money

Comment
-
The banks always win.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostJust noticed this on the BBC website.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm
Not good news for some people I know. And Martin Lewis..
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/new...m/2009/11/testComment
-
maybe not if you had 30 receipted balance enquiries and four statements a monthOriginally posted by Scary View PostI'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
hey what happened to my humans rights?Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
I'm pretty sure there are no people making such a decision. Okay so it costs 35p then?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostIt costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.
Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
People should understand that the charges are normal, but if they want to dodge the charges they need to stay in credit. Simple.
Anyway most of the charge victims are students who just overuse the "beer token dispenser".Cats are evil.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Today 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Yesterday 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Jun 23 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 22 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Jun 22 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52

Comment