Originally posted by Jeebo72
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Banks Win...:(
Collapse
X
-
The point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
They make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?The result is that banks can continue charging high fees for customers who go overdrawn without authority to subsidise the cost of providing current accounts to other customers who stay in the black.Comment
-
It costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.
Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
I did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.Originally posted by Scary View PostThey make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?
It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
I'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostI did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.
It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money

Comment
-
The banks always win.Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostJust noticed this on the BBC website.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm
Not good news for some people I know. And Martin Lewis..
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/new...m/2009/11/testComment
-
maybe not if you had 30 receipted balance enquiries and four statements a monthOriginally posted by Scary View PostI'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
hey what happened to my humans rights?Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1!Comment
-
I'm pretty sure there are no people making such a decision. Okay so it costs 35p then?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostIt costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.
Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
People should understand that the charges are normal, but if they want to dodge the charges they need to stay in credit. Simple.
Anyway most of the charge victims are students who just overuse the "beer token dispenser".Cats are evil.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- National Minimum Wage increase: operational for most umbrella staff, but brace for impact Mar 19 09:13
- Contractors, Joint & Several Liability’s unintended consequences are already piling up Mar 18 07:29
- Contractors, did you know self-employed DBS Checks have changed, for the better? Mar 17 07:56
- Offshoring harms already fraught IT contractors. Here’s what ministers can do Mar 16 07:57
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:20
- Dividends in 2026/27: an expert’s explainer for contractors Mar 13 07:04
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contracting Awards 2026 opens for entries — with new AI category Mar 12 07:26
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 08:18
- Contractors, beware these four traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test Mar 11 00:23

Comment