• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Banks Win...:(

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Jeebo72 View Post
    Good news. If you are going to go over agreed limits why should the bank pay. We've got a good free banking service here so hopefully we won't lose it now.
    The point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      The result is that banks can continue charging high fees for customers who go overdrawn without authority to subsidise the cost of providing current accounts to other customers who stay in the black.
      They make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        The point is why should they charge you £30 for going £1 overdrawn. I thought the banks were claiming the fees were actual costs they incurred which is clearly bunk - .01s of computer time and 30p to send a letter should cover it.
        It costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.

        Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc.
        ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Scary View Post
          They make a loss on accounts in the black? Even after they lend out the cash (multiplied by many times) and charge interest on it (even as they pay little or no interest on the cash in current accounts)?
          I did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.

          It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money



          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            I did a contract at B@rcls, the application put a cost on transactions such as enquiries, also enquiries through the hole in the wall.

            It is easy to see how an account in the black could lose money



            I'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
              Just noticed this on the BBC website.

              http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8376906.stm

              Not good news for some people I know. And Martin Lewis..
              http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/new...m/2009/11/test
              The banks always win.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Scary View Post
                I'm surprised. If I keep a fairly small balance, say 1000GBP and they lend it out 10 times charging 10-30% interest, that's quite a lot of money coming in.
                maybe not if you had 30 receipted balance enquiries and four statements a month


                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  #18
                  hey what happened to my humans rights?
                  Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                  I preferred version 1!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
                    It costs more that 30p to send a letter - there's the cost of the human or machine employed to create the letter for a start.

                    Then there's the human who has to make a decision about the charge etc etc.
                    I'm pretty sure there are no people making such a decision. Okay so it costs 35p then?
                    McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                    Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                    Comment


                      #20
                      People should understand that the charges are normal, but if they want to dodge the charges they need to stay in credit. Simple.

                      Anyway most of the charge victims are students who just overuse the "beer token dispenser".
                      Cats are evil.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X