anyone heard of a guy named el_duder?

[TheFaQQer]

From what I can gather, someone else (not FG) posted something that was waaaaay over the top......

Seems to be true (and I was right, it is in TPD!)

Hi People,

Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings but we have received some fairly scary official complaints about this thread and we have been left with no option but to remove the images.

It was fun while it lasted and we would like to thank everyone who contributed to the thread since sasguru typed the infamous post 'jdjdsjd'.

Kind Regards

CUK Admin

Hi People,

Loving the erotic stories, just don't mention anyone in school clothes please...

I am glad a lot of you did not see some of the offending images that were posted on this thread, shows the mods have been doing a good job. Believe me there has been nasty stuff posted here as I too have had to clean it up at times (no kleenex jokes please). It has made the moderation of the board a lot trickier and just because you have not seen it does not mean it hasn't happened.

Thanks for the suggestion of the registered users only thread, not a bad idea at all and we will certainly look into this.

We look forward to hearing how AtW and Cojak get on, a board romance is just what we need!

CUK Admin

Whilst we have received complaints in the past from individuals and companies we have always deleted offending images or told the complainer to get a grip where the complaint was not of a legal nature - if you don't like it then don't look at it basically. On this occasion our server host has been contacted directly asking for immediate action to be taken.

The recent issue concerns images that were posted where the subjects could have been the wrong side of the legal age limit. We have spent a lot of time moderating this post and removing anything that overstepped the boundaries that we had set when this thread became popular but unfortunately we do not have the time to constantly monitor this thread and we missed some images that may be the ones that caused the problems.

As you will agree, hosting potentially highly illegal images could land us in all manner of trouble so we have made the decision to block all images. Sorry but it is not worth us running the risk of us having the server taken down due to us not having the time to monitor all posts to this thread.

There you go - underage porn images will do it every time.

(And by "do it", I mean lead to a ban on images)

[DiscoStu]

I've just been having a quick look at some of the threads he started, awesome

[AtW]

There you go - underage porn images will do it every time. (And by "do it", I mean lead to a ban on images)

The ban should be applied to person who posted them, not the whole concept of images - they were not attached or uploaded to CUK servers anyway, it was a direct inlined link, CUK had zero responsibility from this point of view apart from removing images and banning (permanently or temporarily) person who did it.

Ban in images was wrong, but convinient, choice.

[TheFaQQer]

The ban should be applied to person who posted them, not the whole concept of images - they were not attached or uploaded to CUK servers anyway, it was a direct inlined link, CUK had zero responsibility from this point of view apart from removing images and banning (permanently or temporarily) person who did it.

Ban in images was wrong, but convinient, choice.

Given the choice, I'd have banned images quickly, too - rather that than lose the whole site.

[AtW]

Given the choice, I'd have banned images quickly, too - rather that than lose the whole site.

Removal of all images in the thread that was dedicated to adult stuff was the correct response, as well as threat to ban anyone who inlines those in the future. This site did not actually host the images - only had HTML inlined, the party that hosted actual images was the one that was liable for distribution, prompt action to remove THESE specific images would have been sufficient legally wise (IMHO of course).

Granted when such threats are received one wants a quick solution and I can see how admin decided to ban all inline images, but IMO thats wrong - links are still being posted to this stuff, do you think it's ok to have link to such images rather than just have them inlined?

As you can see ban on inline images did not address the actual root cause - posting of totally inappropriate content or links to such content on this forum.

[Zippy]

Never mind that inline image stuff - I want to know what AtW and Cojak were up to

[AtW]

I want to know what AtW and Cojak were up to

It's confidential

[AtW]

Nothing in One-A-Day (or the stuff posted by FG in TPD) could be classified as anything but softcore.

I would not know

Point is - those images in my view are still inappropriate: ban on inline images did not solve the issue at all, it's a knee jerk reaction (no offence admin).

[xoggoth]

The Fry from Futurama avatar chap?

[cojak]

Never mind that inline image stuff - I want to know what AtW and Cojak were up to

While I remember most things, that has definitely been lost in the mists of time!

Nope, can't recall and I certainly can't be @rsed to trawl old threads...