Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
David Haye vs Nikolay Valuev
Collapse
X
-
It's not that simple, a good fighter would make the 2 people get in each others way and neutralise their advantage. -
Originally posted by Bunk View PostIt's not that simple, a good fighter would make the 2 people get in each others way and neutralise their advantage.
kill them both with a spoon and will be back in time for breakfastComment
-
Originally posted by Bunk View PostIt's not that simple, a good fighter would make the 2 people get in each others way and neutralise their advantage.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI've heard that, all other things being equal, the advantage is the square of the difference in numbers. So 2 people fighting 1 person don't have double the advantage, but 4 times.
It's not my theory and there is more to it, hence the bit I emboldened in my original remark.Comment
-
-
Ah, I see. It's purely concerned with the number of people enagaging in a firefight. It's not concerned with tactics which would affect that number or any other tactical considerations which might change the outcome.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostHere you go: Lanchester's Square Law
It makes sense though, both sides will be losing people but it will affect the smaller side proportionately more.Comment
-
Which is possibly why enemies try to outflank each other, or divide and conquer. Easier to fight (all things being equal again) two half sized armies twice than a big one once. In (over simplified) theory.Originally posted by Bunk View PostAh, I see. It's purely concerned with the number of people enagaging in a firefight. It's not concerned with tactics which would affect that number or any other tactical considerations which might change the outcome.
It makes sense though, both sides will be losing people but it will affect the smaller side proportionately more.
If there were 4 people in my army and 4 people in some else's army, I would sure prefer it to be 4 against 2 twice than 4 against 4 once (or better still 4 against 1, 4 times).Comment
-
They wre interviewing Haye on R4 this morning. Came over as an intelligent and articulate bloke.
Talking about his hand. He said he thinks he's broken it and did it in the second round. He'd done it once before, a few years ago, when he hit his opponent on the head with a badly aimed punch. Skulls being somewhat resilient when hit, his hand came off worse. Apparently this time he did it punching the other guys jaw!
It may not have been an entertaining fight to watch but Haye did exactly what he needed to do. Nothing flashy, no showboating, just work hard and out box the other guy."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostIt may not have been an entertaining fight to watch but Haye did exactly what he needed to do. Nothing flashy, no showboating, just work hard and out box the other guy.
outrunComment
-
Originally posted by AtW View Post
outrun
outhink
Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Originally posted by snaw View Post
outhink
Not hard.
Apparently the Russian had several degrees from some tinpot institution.
So the same as the old 11+.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Today 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Yesterday 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47

Comment