• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Just when is something going to be done....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
    I didn't mean literally just the schools but our society in general needs fixed. It took a long time to get this way, it won't be quick to fix, but if you just try to fix the broken individuals by jailing them, you will never be free of the problem because you are creating more of them as fast as you jail them.
    I know what you mean.
    My post was what to do about the backlog once the fix has been implemented




    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
      You are falling victim to the fallacy that a broken society can be fixed with more laws. It can't: you need to fix society, and that can not be done with a stroke of the pen (especially if you believe that there is no such thing as society).

      As John Ruskin said in the 19th century, if you fix the schools then you won't need to fix the prisons.
      I agree but I also believe that if a crime is committed the punishment should fit it - in many cases now it clearly doesn't. For example, the two thugs in Norwich who were beating up a homeless man - a passer by tried to help him and so they killed him. Sentence - seven years for one thug, seven and a half for the other.
      Numbly tolerating the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity for all.

      Comment


        #13
        Does the panel think the kind of thing would be less common if our national pastime wasn't going down the boozer, getting stoned and behaving like drunks?

        Comment


          #14
          There is no correlation with death penalty and murder and if anything the fact that there has been so many miscarriages of justice should be the main reason for not having it. The death penalty should only apply to war criminals, politicians and corrupt civil servants.

          http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cr...ers-per-capita
          "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
            Does the panel think the kind of thing would be less common if our national pastime wasn't going down the boozer, getting stoned and behaving like drunks?
            Possibly, but the underlying cause is that we are an arrogant nasty shallow individualist society - unpleasant characteristics that Thatcher and others tapped into.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by zeitghost
              My mum blames the Beatles & Harold Wilson/Roy Jenkins.

              Works for me.
              Give us a break. Roy Jenkins was the last Labour Home Secretary that I actually thought was OK.
              Step outside posh boy

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
                But I would have thought that part of the purpose of the law and order system would be to provide a deterrent to stop bad things happening in the first place.
                When the police force was initially set up, its job was to maintain the peace - to prevent laws being broken, and to (try to) ensure the safety of the public. It was specifically not designed to investigate crime, or to track down miscreants. That job was for the magistrates.
                Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                  When the police force was initially set up, its job was to maintain the peace - to prevent laws being broken, and to (try to) ensure the safety of the public. It was specifically not designed to investigate crime, or to track down miscreants. That job was for the magistrates.
                  Mission Creep.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Only way to be safe is to kill all the children. Except mine. They are perfect.



                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                      They just need a hug.
                      http://forums.contractoruk.com/990099-post9.html

                      Nice pali!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X