• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The little things that annoy you

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    i.e. crashing at speed is more likely to be fatal.

    You can of course go very fast indeed and survive the experience. Speed in and of itself doesn't kill.
    Oh, you mean as speed is not an absolute, it's no more dangerous travelling at 0 mph relative to the ground than it is at tens of kilometres per second about the sun? Well, yes, strictly and in the purest sense true. But for practical purposes, speed wrt the ground and probability of fatal accident appear to be related. One could try to make everyone go at the same velocity wrt to one another and minimise other possible mishaps or collisions between them, but that speed difference wrt ground will always be there. Rubber cars, trees and bridges might help in that case Actually, speed is a component of kinetic energy, which is potential killing energy, so in that way we might say speed potentially kills. Happy now?

    Comment


      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
      Wrong again SB.

      The do not have to be on duty and you don't have to be a policeman...

      RT Act Sec 87. Exemption of fire brigade, ambulance and police vehicles from speed limits.[ F1 (1)] No statutory provision imposing a speed limit on motor vehicles shall apply to any vehicle on an occasion when it is being used for [F2 fire and rescue authority], ambulance or police purposes, if the observance of that provision would be likely to hinder the use of the vehicle for the purpose for which it is being used on that occasion.
      I think you will find that this explanation relates to them being "on duty". The clincher is when it is being used for fire and rescue authority, ambulance, or police purposes
      If they are not "On Duty", then they would not be in said vehicles. Not that hard to understand is it? Then again, if you require more than 1 lane with which to overtake, maybe it is?

      “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

      Comment


        Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
        Oh, you mean as speed is not an absolute, it's no more dangerous travelling at 0 mph relative to the ground than it is at tens of kilometres per second about the sun?
        I mean that travelling at 100mph, or 200mph, or even 500mph, relative to the ground is not in and of itself going to kill you.

        The deeper point is that excessive speed is not the same thing as speed itself. Imploring people to avoid the latter rather than helping them understand the difference does more harm than good IMO.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          I mean that travelling at 100mph, or 200mph, or even 500mph, relative to the ground is not in and of itself going to kill you.

          The deeper point is that excessive speed is not the same thing as speed itself. Imploring people to avoid the latter rather than helping them understand the difference does more harm than good IMO.
          Speed may not kill, but if done in a car, the chances [potential] of having a fatal accident increase dramatically (proportional to the 4th power in some cases according to your article I think) in practise with speed wrt to ground. Did you see the table just over half way down in your article? For motorways I think predominantly, the effect of speed on accident fatalities was quite marked.

          Comment


            Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
            You drive at whatever speed you wish. However, just make sure you're not causing an obstacle and your driving is predictable as I prepare to overtake is all I ask.
            That is exactly how I always drive. The whole issue surrounds the "causing an obstacle" definition. For some, it appears, that constitutes anyone not doing upwards of 85-90, as they need to be penned into the inside lane.

            “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

            Comment


              Oi you lot.

              Your ability to stay in lane on a motorway is moot but your inability to stay on topic in a thread is beyond doubt.

              Can't you just decide which of you is the best driver once and for all, and defer to them from now on? Meet at Silverstone this Friday at 6. Let me know the result by midday Monday.

              thanks,
              tl

              Comment


                Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
                Oi you lot.

                Your ability to stay in lane on a motorway is moot but your inability to stay on topic in a thread is beyond doubt.

                Can't you just decide which of you is the best driver once and for all, and defer to them from now on? Meet at Silverstone this Friday at 6. Let me know the result by midday Monday.

                thanks,
                tl
                What about an on-line motor racing "game" played head to head?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                  What about an on-line motor racing "game" played head to head?
                  How about the A429 at 15:00 on Friday?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
                    How about the A429 at 15:00 on Friday?
                    Is it freeware?

                    Comment


                      Well this is annoying:
                      finding out (I think on CUK) that government sites are sticking to ie6;
                      finally getting ie6 working on a VPC;
                      and finding out my website layout looks like cRaZy PaViNg on ie6.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X