First they introduce a load of retrospective tax legislation, then bitch and whine when some retrospective expenses rules are introduced. Hypocrites...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
MP's make me cross
Collapse
X
-
-
Politicians are a law to themselves. The expenses thing is small potatoes though. I'd prefer it if more investigative effort were put into how they rake their millions in once they leave office. -
It's just not fair.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostFirst they introduce a load of retrospective tax legislation, then bitch and whine when some retrospective expenses rules are introduced. Hypocrites...Comment
-
That element of this is hilarious! Welcome to the world you created, cretins.Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostFirst they introduce a load of retrospective tax legislation, then bitch and whine when some retrospective expenses rules are introduced. Hypocrites...Comment
-
I'd like it if they'd investigate how they rake their millions whilst in office.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostPoliticians are a law to themselves. The expenses thing is small potatoes though. I'd prefer it if more investigative effort were put into how they rake their millions in once they leave office.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
Taking advantage of the rules to deliberately cream money is wrong for someone in a position of authority (though most people here would do it and boast about it). Retrospective penalties are stupid and wrong. Trying to solve wrong with wrong is wrong and also stupid, it's just a piece of spin which party can bully its members the most and get public applause.
That rather long BNP666 thread is on here somewhere about retrospective charges.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
One of the hypocrites in question just got knifed on Newsnight. Busy bleating about how it had been applied retrospectively, until it was pointed out to him by the reporter that he had signed Early Day Motions supporting retrospective taxes.
Priceless. Catch it on iPlayer.Comment
-
Now that is a good one. I don't agree with the view that most/all MPs are out for all they can get, but clearly some are real pieces of work. Problem is, the guys who claim a few £100 get slagged as much as the ones who set out to exploit the system to the utmost to the tune of £tens of thousands,Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - AesopComment
-
Agree with d000hg that retrospective changes are wholly wrong, even if applied to MPs. What was claimed according to the then rules is not the issue, water under the bridge.
what really sucks is that they make tax laws that apply only to themselves in the first place and that is what need to be stopped. If you have ever looked though the various finance acts you will find there are clauses with specific exemptions and modifications for members of parliament. Why? What is special to their job that would not apply equally to, say, the MD of a company with factories in two parts of the country?bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Today 08:44
- Cookie Policy Yesterday 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Yesterday 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03

Comment